Mechanical Ventilator Control Using Patient-Specific CP Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mechanical ventilation poses challenges in selecting appropriate ventilation modes and adjusting settings to avoid lung damage due to oxygen toxicity and barotrauma, with existing methods being reactive and not tailored to individual patient pathophysiology.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a ventilator optimization component to automatically update settings based on physiological parameter constraints, minimizing risks of barotrauma, oxygen toxicity, and improving oxygenation and CO2 removal by computing a cost function for candidate settings adjustments and applying optimization algorithms to predict patient responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If FiO2 is increased to improve patient oxygenation, then oxygenation is improved, but oxygen toxicity risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveoxygenationVSAvoidoxygen toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the FiO2 parameter based on real-time patient response monitoring and predictive modeling, transitioning from static trial-and-error setting to adaptive parameter optimization that balances oxygenation needs against toxicity risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously monitoring patient physiological responses to ventilator settings and using this information to predict and prevent harmful effects, enabling real-time adjustment of FiO2 to maintain optimal oxygenation while avoiding oxygen toxicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If inspiratory pressure is increased to increase tidal volume, then oxygenation is improved, but barotrauma risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetidal volumeVSAvoidbarotrauma
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically optimizes inspiratory pressure parameters by predicting patient-specific pressure-volume relationships and adjusting settings to achieve target tidal volumes while maintaining pressure within safe thresholds, preventing barotrauma

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary predictive analysis of patient response to potential pressure adjustments before implementing changes, allowing prevention of barotrauma by anticipating harmful pressure effects before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If ventilator settings are adjusted on a trial-and-error basis, then settings can be customized to patient response, but response time is delayed and patient injury may occur before correction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient-specific customizationVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary predictive modeling of patient response to various ventilator settings before actual implementation, allowing optimal settings to be determined in advance based on predicted patient physiology rather than waiting for trial-and-error observations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical trial-and-error adjustment process with computational predictive modeling and optimization algorithms that automatically determine optimal ventilator settings based on patient-specific physiological predictions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Stability of the object's composition

If standardized ventilator management protocols are employed, then consistency is improved, but settings are not tailored to specific patient pathophysiology

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotocol consistencyVSAvoidpatient-specific tailoring
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by customizing ventilator settings to each patient's specific pathophysiological characteristics while maintaining adherence to standardized safety protocols, creating patient-specific optimization within the framework of established guidelines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3238110B1Systems and methods for model-based optimization of mechanical ventilation
Publication Date: 2021.04.07 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP3238110B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3238110B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3238110B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanical ventilator (10) is connected with a ventilated patient (12) to provide ventilation in accordance with ventilator settings of the mechanical ventilator. Physiological values(variables)are acquired for the ventilated patient using physiological sensors (32). A ventilated patient cardiopulmonary (CP) model (40) is fitted to the acquired physiological variables values to generate a fitted ventilated patient CP model by fine-tuning its parameters (50). Updated ventilator settings are determined by adjusting model ventilator settings of the fitted ventilated patient CP model to minimize a cost function (60). The updated ventilator settings may be displayed on a display component (22) as recommended ventilator settings for the ventilated patient, or the ventilator settings of the mechanical ventilator may be automatically changed to the updated ventilator settings so as to automatically control the mechanical ventilator.