Venturi Mixing Nozzle Bluff Bodies for Low-Loss Fluid Mixing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing Venturi-type mixing nozzles face challenges in efficiently mixing fluids with significant density differences, leading to issues like boundary layer separation, pressure drop, and increased fan power requirements, particularly when dealing with combustible gases like hydrogen.
Innovation Solution
Incorporating bluff bodies into the nozzle design that create a low-pressure zone and turbulence, ensuring the lighter fluid is injected close to the central axis, surrounded by the heavier fluid, enhancing mixing and reducing pressure loss.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If a conventional Venturi-type mixing nozzle is used to mix fluids with significant density differences, then fluid mixing can be achieved, but boundary layer separation occurs leading to increased pressure drop and fan power requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality by introducing bluff bodies at specific locations within the mixing nozzle to create localized low-pressure zones and turbulence. These bluff bodies are strategically positioned to generate mixing effects only where needed, rather than modifying the entire nozzle structure. This localized approach improves mixing efficiency while minimizing overall pressure drop and energy loss.
Solution Approach 2:
The bluff bodies in the mixing nozzle generate turbulence and chaotic flow patterns that can be considered a form of mechanical vibration or oscillation in the fluid flow. This turbulence enhances mixing between fluids of different densities by creating chaotic advection and increasing interfacial area, thereby improving mixing efficiency without requiring excessive pressure drop.
2Productivity
If conventional Venturi-type mixing nozzle is used, then fluids can be mixed, but fan power requirements increase due to boundary layer separation
Solution Approach 1:
By placing bluff bodies at specific locations within the mixing nozzle, the patent creates localized regions of enhanced mixing and turbulence. This localized modification improves mixing efficiency without requiring system-wide increases in fan power, as the bluff bodies generate the necessary mixing effects through their geometric configuration and interaction with the flow.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent converts the potentially harmful effect of boundary layer separation into a beneficial turbulence-generating mechanism. The bluff bodies are designed to exploit the flow conditions that would normally cause separation and transform this into useful chaotic mixing, thereby reducing the need for additional fan power while improving mixing efficiency.
3Productivity
If lighter fluid is injected into heavier fluid, then mixing can occur, but the lighter fluid tends to rise and form unstable flow patterns
Solution Approach 1:
The bluff bodies generate turbulence and chaotic flow patterns that act as a form of mechanical mixing. This turbulence creates chaotic advection and enhances the mixing of lighter and heavier fluids by preventing stable stratification and promoting intermittent mixing events, thereby improving mixing efficiency while maintaining flow stability.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent modifies flow parameters by introducing bluff bodies that change the velocity distribution, pressure distribution, and turbulence characteristics within the mixing nozzle. These parameter changes create conditions that favor stable mixing of fluids with different densities, preventing the lighter fluid from simply rising and forming unstable flow patterns.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Improves fluid mixing efficiency, reduces pressure drop, and extends the operating range of the nozzle, while preventing flame flashback by optimizing fluid flow and reducing the risk of unintended ignition.
Implementation Method 1
The main flow passage comprises a passage constriction between the inlet end and the outlet end for creation of a negative pressure region in the main flow passage
Implementation Method 2
The at least one bluff body is integrally formed with the nozzle body and extends in radial direction of the main flow passage towards a nozzle body central axis for creation of a low pressure zone that extends in the radial direction of the main flow passage along the at least one bluff body
Implementation Method 3
Incorporating bluff bodies into the nozzle design that create a low-pressure zone and turbulence
Implementation Method 4
a second fluid enters the main flow passage for being mixed with the first fluid in the main flow passage
Data Source
Figure 1~2
Figure 3~4
Figure 5~6(B)
AI summary
A Venturi-type mixing nozzle (100) with a nozzle body (105) that comprises a main flow passage (110) having an inlet end (120) and an outlet end (130), wherein a first fluid (210) enters the main flow passage (110) via the inlet end (120), the main flow passage (110) comprising a passage constriction (140) between the inlet end (120) and the outlet end (130) for creation of a negative pressure region (125) in the main flow passage (110), wherein the passage constriction (140) comprises at least one lateral inlet opening (220, 221) through which a second fluid (230) enters the main flow passage (110) for being mixed with the first fluid (210) in the main flow passage (110), and wherein at least one bluff body (150, 151) is arranged in the main flow passage (110).