Venturi Vacuum for Boosted Engine Fuel Vapor Purging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Downsizing and boosting engines make it difficult to purge fuel vapors from a fuel vapor canister, especially when intake manifold pressure is high, as it limits the flow from the canister to the intake manifold and reduces engine power.

Innovation Solution

Decreasing the throttle opening area and increasing the boost pressure produced by the compressor to enhance the vacuum flow from the fuel vapor canister to the intake system, using a venturi in the compressor bypass loop to create a pressure depression that draws vapors while maintaining desired engine output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the engine is downsized and boosted to increase engine efficiency and output, then engine efficiency and power output are improved, but fuel vapor purging becomes difficult and engine power is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine outputVSAvoidfuel vapor purging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the throttle opening area and boost pressure based on real-time fuel vapor levels in the canister. When fuel vapor concentration exceeds a threshold, the controller decreases throttle opening area and increases boost pressure to enhance purging efficiency. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize both engine performance and vapor purging under varying operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes key operating parameters (throttle opening area and boost pressure) to resolve the contradiction. By decreasing throttle opening area and increasing boost pressure, the system creates stronger vacuum flow through the venturi to improve fuel vapor purging while maintaining engine output. These parameter changes are implemented through controller feedback based on fuel vapor sensor readings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the throttle opening is closed to increase vapor flow from the canister, then fuel vapor purging is improved, but engine power is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel vapor purging rateVSAvoidengine power
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The venturi acts as an intermediary device that uses compressed air to create vacuum and draw fuel vapors from the canister without requiring throttle closure. The venturi positioned in the compressor bypass loop creates a pressure differential that facilitates vapor flow while the throttle remains open, thus maintaining engine power while improving purging efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional mechanical approach of closing the throttle to increase vapor flow with a different mechanism: using the venturi and compressed air to create vacuum flow. This substitution allows vapor purging to occur without restricting the throttle, thereby maintaining engine power output while achieving effective vapor removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If boost pressure is increased to improve vapor flow through the venturi, then fuel vapor purging is enhanced, but engine energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor flow rateVSAvoidengine energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from fuel vapor sensors to control the boost pressure and throttle opening adjustments. When fuel vapor concentration exceeds a threshold, the controller increases boost pressure to enhance purging. The feedback mechanism ensures that energy-consuming boost pressure increases are applied only when necessary, optimizing the balance between purging efficiency and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by increasing boost pressure only to the extent necessary to achieve effective vapor purging, rather than continuously operating at maximum boost. The controller adjusts boost pressure based on real-time vapor levels, applying excessive action only when needed and reducing it when vapor concentrations are low, thereby minimizing unnecessary energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Improves fuel vapor purging efficiency for boosted engines, maintains engine output, and limits energy consumption by optimizing venturi efficiency only when excess fuel vapors are present.

Implementation Method 1

a venturi located in a compressor bypass loop can provide vacuum to draw fuel vapors from a fuel vapor canister to an intake system by using compressed air to create vacuum at the venturi

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVenturi effect: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 2

the pressure depression created at the venturi also increases, thereby increasing the potential for flow between a fuel vapor canister and the intake system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure depression: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8744726B2Method for purging fuel vapors
Publication Date: 2014.06.03 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US8744726B2 patent drawing
  • US8744726B2 patent drawing
  • US8744726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for improving purging of fuel vapors from a boosted engine is presented. In one embodiment, the method increases the efficiency of a venturi that supplies vacuum to purge fuel vapors from a vapor storage canister.