Verified Identity Marketplace for Secure Peer-to-Peer Transactions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Peer-to-peer online marketplaces and dating websites do not effectively verify the identities and backgrounds of users, leading to risks when strangers meet for transactions or interactions.

Innovation Solution

A close marketplace system that verifies users' institutional affiliation and criminal records through approved institutions, using methods like email verification, background checks, and consent processes to ensure users' identities and backgrounds are validated before allowing interactions or transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If user verification processes are implemented (email verification, background checks), then user safety and trust are improved, but system complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs verification actions in advance before allowing user interactions. Email verification is completed during registration, and background checks are conducted before users can access marketplace features. This preliminary verification ensures safety is established beforehand, reducing the need for complex ongoing verification mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary verification mechanisms between users and the marketplace. Third-party background check services act as intermediaries to verify user identities and histories. Email verification serves as an intermediary step to confirm user authenticity. These intermediaries handle the complexity of verification, keeping the core marketplace system relatively simple while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If comprehensive background checks are performed, then user trust and security are enhanced, but time consumption and processing duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser trustVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Background checks and verification processes are conducted in advance during the user registration and onboarding phase. This preliminary action ensures that when users engage in marketplace transactions, the verification is already complete, minimizing time loss during actual trading activities. The system accepts some upfront time investment to prevent larger time losses during critical transaction moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a tiered verification approach where essential checks (email verification, basic identity confirmation) are performed minimally to enable core functionality, while more extensive background checks are conducted selectively based on user profiles, transaction types, or risk assessments. This partial action approach balances thorough verification with time efficiency, performing only the necessary level of checking for each situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If verification requirements are made more stringent, then marketplace safety and quality are improved, but ease of operation and user accessibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketplace safetyVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements differentiated verification requirements based on user profiles, transaction types, and risk levels. Not all users undergo the same extensive verification process. The system performs partial verification for low-risk scenarios and more comprehensive checks only when necessary, maintaining safety while preserving ease of operation for routine transactions. This selective approach ensures accessibility is not unnecessarily hindered by uniform stringent requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Different levels of verification stringency are applied to different parts of the marketplace and different user segments. High-value transactions or sensitive categories may require more stringent verification, while routine low-risk transactions use simpler verification processes. This localized quality approach ensures safety is enhanced where needed without making the entire system unnecessarily complex or difficult to operate for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11610279B2Close marketplace
Publication Date: 2023.03.21 CLOSEQUEST INC
  • US11610279B2 patent drawing
  • US11610279B2 patent drawing
  • US11610279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A close marketplace is provided where the users' institutional affiliation, identity, and/or criminal record are verified in order to become members. Although an unregistered person may browse some of the posted listings, in order to buy, sell, contact, and/or meet another member of the marketplace, a person has to be affiliated with an approved institution, the person's real life identity has to be verified, and/or the person's criminal background has to meet a pre-determined criteria. The marketplace lowers the risk for the strangers who may want to interact with each other through a close circle of professionals. When two members are going to meet through the marketplace to buy and sell items, to rent, to be roommates, to date, etc., they have an assurance that each member has gone through a validation and verification process.