Version Performance Delta Tester for Image Rejection Analysis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Different versions of data testing applications yield varying results, making it challenging to determine performance differences and identify new rejection criteria or standards introduced in updated versions.
Innovation Solution
A version performance digital image data delta tester is developed, which includes a receiver to collect digital images from mobile devices, processes them using both legacy and updated versions, and identifies images triggering rejections in both versions, providing insights into changes in rejection criteria.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If updated version of application is introduced with new features and rejection criteria, then functionality and detection capability are improved, but consistency with legacy version and measurement stability deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the rejection criteria into legacy rejection criteria and updated rejection criteria, allowing separate analysis and comparison. This enables the system to maintain stability by preserving legacy criteria while adapting to new criteria, resolving the contradiction between improved detection capability and measurement stability.
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes parameters by introducing version identification and delta analysis, allowing it to track and compare differences between legacy and updated versions. This enables controlled adaptation while maintaining stability through systematic parameter comparison.
2Loss of information
If delta analysis between legacy and updated versions is performed, then understanding of performance differences is improved, but complexity of testing process increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary delta analysis component that automatically compares legacy and updated version results. This intermediary handles the complex comparison logic, providing complete information about performance differences while shielding users from the underlying complexity of the testing process.
Solution Approach 2:
The system creates copies of test results from both legacy and updated versions, allowing parallel analysis without affecting the original testing processes. This enables comprehensive delta analysis while maintaining simplicity in the execution of individual version tests.
3Reliability
If comprehensive testing of multiple application versions is conducted, then reliability of performance evaluation is improved, but time consumption and productivity decrease
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring the delta analysis framework and establishing comparison criteria before executing version tests. This allows comprehensive multi-version testing to be conducted systematically, improving reliability while reducing time consumption through advance preparation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system maintains continuity of useful action by automatically processing and comparing results from multiple versions without interruption. The delta analysis continuously evaluates performance differences across versions, ensuring reliable evaluation while minimizing idle time and optimizing the testing workflow.
Data Source
AI summary
An article of manufacture is described. The article of manufacture may include a computer usable medium having computer readable program code embodied therein. The code when executed by a processor may cause a computer to generate version performance digital image data delta information. The code may cause the computer to receive a plurality of digital images, a plurality of legacy rejections associated with the digital images and a plurality of updated rejections associated with the digital images. The code may cause the computer to identify one or more digital images that trigger a first rejection with the legacy version and that trigger a second rejection with the updated version wherein the first rejection and the second rejection are the same rejection and to identify one or more occurrences wherein the first rejection and the second rejection are different rejections.