Information processing apparatus, method for controlling information processing apparatus, program, and storage medium

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic devices may not support purpose-specific permissions for information transmission, necessitating compliance with legally required consent management for personal information handling, especially after software updates or legal amendments.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that assigns permission versions to manage updates, dividing permissions into service and analysis categories, and converts user-consented purpose-specific permissions into a unified transmission permission based on device capability, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If purpose-specific permission statements are implemented to comply with legal requirements, then compliance with personal information protection laws is improved, but device compatibility deteriorates because past electronic devices may not support purpose-specific permissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance with personal information protection lawsVSAvoiddevice compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary that manages permission statements and their versions. The server stores multiple versions of permission statements and provides them to electronic devices based on their capabilities. This mediator allows new legal requirements to be implemented on modern devices while maintaining compatibility with older devices that cannot support purpose-specific permissions, thus resolving the contradiction between compliance and device compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If permission statements are updated to reflect legal amendments, then legal compliance is improved, but system complexity increases due to version control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal complianceVSAvoidversion control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated version control system where the server automatically manages permission statement versions. When legal amendments occur, the server automatically creates new versions of permission statements and distributes them to electronic devices. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual version control by device users, reducing system complexity while maintaining legal compliance through automatic updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple purpose-specific permission categories are implemented, then user consent management is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to multiple consent requests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser consent managementVSAvoiduser interaction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple purpose-specific permission categories into a unified permission statement structure managed by the server. Instead of presenting users with separate consent requests for each permission category, the system combines them into a single comprehensive permission statement that the user can accept or reject. This merging approach maintains proper consent management for different purposes while significantly improving ease of operation by reducing the number of user interactions required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4589456A1Information processing apparatus, method for controlling information processing apparatus, program, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.23 CANON KK
  • EP4589456A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4589456A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4589456A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

An information processing apparatus (200) includes: an acceptance-unit configured to accept a user operation indicating whether or not consent is given to a first-permission-content, which is related to information transmission from an electronic-device, and a user operation indicating whether or not consent is given to a second-permission-content, which is different from the first-permission-content and related to information transmission from the electronic-device; and a control-unit configured so that, in a case where an operation indicating non-consent to the first-permission-content is accepted, control of transmitting to the electronic-device second-information, which corresponds to non-consent, is performed regardless of whether or not an operation indicating consent to the second-permission-content is accepted.