Automated Vertebra Labeling in 3D Medical Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3D medical images, it is challenging for both untrained and experienced radiologists to accurately identify vertebrae due to their similarity, making it difficult to distinguish specific vertebrae using conventional naming conventions like C1-C7, T1-T12, L1-L5, and S1-S5.

Innovation Solution

A system and algorithm that analyzes medical images to identify and label vertebrae by constructing chains of candidate vertebral shapes, using Multi-scale Image Segmentation, aggregate scoring, sieving, and chain construction, which allows for automatic identification and labeling of vertebrae, even in the presence of spinal irregularities, by employing techniques such as Dijkstra-like, RANSAC, and genetic algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional manual identification methods are used by radiologists, then human expertise can be applied to analyze medical images, but identification accuracy of specific vertebrae deteriorates due to similarity between adjacent vertebrae

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebra identification accuracyVSAvoididentification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the spine into individual vertebrae by dividing the imaging data into separate volumetric regions. Each vertebra is isolated and assigned a unique identifier, transforming the complex task of identifying similar-looking vertebrae into a systematic process of segmenting and labeling discrete anatomical units. This segmentation approach resolves the identification accuracy problem by creating distinct analytical units for each vertebra.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from 2D image analysis to 3D volumetric analysis by acquiring and processing multi-planar reconstruction data. This dimensional upgrade allows the system to exploit depth information and spatial relationships that are not visible in single 2D slices, enabling accurate vertebra differentiation based on three-dimensional geometric characteristics and positional relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If automatic vertebra identification algorithms are implemented, then identification speed and consistency improve, but algorithm complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebra identification speedVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary segmentation and labeling of vertebrae before final identification and reporting. By pre-processing the data to establish basic vertebra boundaries and characteristics, the system reduces the computational burden of subsequent identification steps. This preliminary action enables faster processing while maintaining accuracy, as the heavy lifting of data organization is completed in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that bridges raw imaging data and final vertebra identification. This intermediate stage includes data normalization, feature extraction, and preliminary classification steps that simplify the input for the final identification algorithm, reducing its complexity while preserving identification accuracy and enabling scalable implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If detailed analysis of all vertebrae is performed, then comprehensive spinal assessment is achieved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal assessment completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different levels of analysis to different regions of the spine based on clinical relevance and anomaly detection. Rather than uniformly processing all vertebrae with the same computational intensity, the system adapts its analysis depth to local requirements, focusing computational resources on regions of interest while maintaining comprehensive coverage for baseline assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a tiered analysis approach where a complete but lightweight assessment is performed on all vertebrae, with more intensive analysis applied only when anomalies are detected or when clinically indicated. This partial application of detailed analysis maintains reliability for routine cases while reducing processing time, allowing the system to scale its computational effort to match actual diagnostic needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8509502B2Spine labeling
Publication Date: 2013.08.13 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYST TECH
  • US8509502B2 patent drawing
  • US8509502B2 patent drawing
  • US8509502B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image analysis system comprising: (a) an image input module adapted to receive a medical image; and (b) an analytic module adapted to segment the image, identify a plurality of vertebrae and label each vertebra.