Vertebrae Segmentation Using 3D Polynomial Spinal Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for automatically detecting and segmenting vertebrae in MRI images face challenges due to high noise levels and intensity inhomogeneities, making it difficult to accurately distinguish between healthy and affected vertebrae, especially in cases of severe metastases.

Innovation Solution

A method using a 3D-polynomial model based on anatomical knowledge to detect and segment the spinal cord, allowing for robust segmentation of the vertebrae column and vertebrae body, even in severe pathological changes, by constructing a parametric model from geometric primitives and applying RANSAC for accurate centerline estimation and segmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional segmentation methods are used in MRI images, then vertebrae can be segmented, but the segmentation accuracy deteriorates due to high noise levels and intensity inhomogeneities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation reliabilityVSAvoidsegmentation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary detection of the spinal cord using a 3D polynomial model and RANSAC algorithm before vertebrae segmentation. This preliminary action establishes a reliable reference framework that guides subsequent segmentation, improving both reliability and precision by working from a stable anatomical landmark outward to the vertebrae boundaries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes parameters by using a parametric model of the vertebrae with adjustable parameters for height, width, and position. This allows the segmentation to adapt to varying noise levels and intensity inhomogeneities by optimizing model parameters rather than relying on fixed threshold values, thereby maintaining precision across different image quality conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If automatic segmentation is implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to difficulty in detecting vertebrae boundaries in noisy images

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation speedVSAvoidboundary detection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal cord serves as an intermediary structure that facilitates automatic segmentation. By first detecting the spinal cord with high precision using the 3D polynomial model, the system creates a reliable intermediate reference that makes subsequent vertebrae boundary detection easier and more accurate, enabling automation without sacrificing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The method segments the segmentation process itself into distinct stages: spinal cord detection, vertebrae localization, and boundary refinement. This multi-stage segmentation approach allows each stage to be optimized independently, maintaining high productivity through automation while improving boundary detection precision through progressive refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If robust segmentation is achieved through complex modeling, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation reliabilityVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D polynomial model serves multiple functions: it detects the spinal cord centerline, defines the region of interest for vertebrae segmentation, and provides a coordinate system for parametric modeling. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining reliability, as one robust model accomplishes what would otherwise require multiple separate algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If parametric modeling is used, then adaptability to pathological changes is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to model assumptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetolerance to pathological changesVSAvoidsegmentation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The parametric model uses dynamic parameters that can be adjusted based on local image features and anatomical variations. Rather than assuming fixed vertebrae dimensions, the model adapts its parameters (height, width, position) to match actual observed structures, allowing it to handle pathological changes while maintaining precision through data-driven parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8175349B2System and method for segmenting vertebrae in digitized images
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
  • US8175349B2 patent drawing
  • US8175349B2 patent drawing
  • US8175349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for segmenting vertebrae in digitized images includes providing a plurality of digitized whole-body images, detecting and segmenting a spinal cord using 3D polynomial spinal model in each of the plurality of images, finding a height of each vertebrae in each image from intensity projections along the spinal cord, and building a parametric model of a vertebrae from the plurality of images. The method further includes providing a new digitized whole-body image including a spinal cord, fitting an ellipse to each vertebrae of the spinal cord to find the major and minor axes, and applying constraints to the major and minor axes in the new image based on the parametric model to segment the vertebrae.