Vertebral Implant with Integrated Plate and Cage for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for a vertebral implant and method that is easier to use, safer, and more cost-effective for attaching to vertebral members, while minimizing trauma to surrounding tissue and improving surgical efficacy, particularly in minimally invasive procedures for spinal pathologies such as degeneration, trauma, tumor, or infection.

Innovation Solution

The vertebral implant includes a plate with contact sections and legs that fit within the intervertebral space, a cage positioned between the legs, and anchors for secure attachment, designed to be implanted using a minimally invasive approach, such as posterior far lateral access, with features like contoured shapes to avoid nerve roots and adjustable angles for optimal positioning and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional interbody devices (cage and plate) are used, then stabilization and restoration of the spine is achieved, but surgical trauma to surrounding tissue increases and surgical complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal stabilizationVSAvoidsurgical trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the cage and plate into a single integrated interbody device. The plate forms the main body with contact surfaces for vertebral bodies, while legs extend from the plate to engage the intervertebral space. This integration eliminates the need for separate cage and plate components, reducing surgical trauma and complexity while maintaining spinal stabilization functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated device is segmented into functional zones: a plate portion with superior and inferior contact surfaces for vertebral body contact, and multiple legs extending into the intervertebral space. This segmentation allows the device to perform multiple functions (stabilization, space maintenance, fusion support) simultaneously while minimizing surgical trauma through a single implantable unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional cage and plate devices are implanted, then spinal fusion is achieved, but device complexity and surgical time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal fusionVSAvoiddevice assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the cage and plate into one monolithic structure where the plate serves as the main body and legs extend directly from it. This eliminates the need for separate components that would require assembly, reducing device complexity while ensuring reliable spinal fusion through the integrated structure's mechanical interlocking with vertebral bodies and intervertebral space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If minimally invasive techniques are used, then surgical trauma is reduced, but implantation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue traumaVSAvoidimplantation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device features locally optimized geometries: contact surfaces on the plate are shaped to match vertebral body contours for stable seating, while legs are configured with specific orientations and spacings to engage the intervertebral space optimally. This local quality optimization allows minimally invasive insertion through small incisions while maintaining ease of implantation through intuitive anatomical fitting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The contact surfaces of the plate are contoured with curved geometries that match the natural anatomy of vertebral bodies. This curvature allows the device to self-align and seat properly during minimally invasive insertion, reducing implantation difficulty despite the reduced surgical exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Ease of operation

If larger incisions are made for implant insertion, then implantation ease increases, but surgical trauma and recovery time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion easeVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed with localized contact surfaces and leg configurations that engage anatomical landmarks during insertion. This allows the surgeon to guide the device into proper position through small incisions using tactile feedback and anatomical alignment, maintaining insertion ease while minimizing incision size and subsequent recovery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8956415B2Vertebral implant
Publication Date: 2015.02.17 WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC INC
  • US8956415B2 patent drawing
  • US8956415B2 patent drawing
  • US8956415B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An implant and method for attaching to vertebral members with the implant including a plate and a cage. The plate is configured to be positioned against and anchored to the bodies of the vertebral members. The plate may also extend into the intervertebral space between the vertebral members. The cage extends outward from the plate and is positioned within the intervertebral space. The implant provides a low profile that is positionable between the bodies of the vertebral members and the lamina/pars/facet joint. The implant may be implanted utilizing a lateral access to the spine. The implant and method may further include just the plate without the cage.