Vertebral Body Replacement With Resilient Support Member

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vertebral body replacement (VBR) apparatuses are rigid and static, leading to point-loading on bone-contacting surfaces, which can cause adjacent vertebral body subsidence and increased failure risk, and fail to efficiently distribute forces or stimulate bone graft growth.

Innovation Solution

A VBR apparatus with a telescoping design and a resilient support member that allows for axial and lateral flexibility, incorporating a spring portion with struts and hanging beams to maintain elasticity and distribute forces effectively, promoting bone graft growth and reducing the risk of subsidence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a rigid VBR apparatus is used, then structural support and stability are provided, but point-loading on bone-contacting surfaces occurs causing adjacent vertebral body subsidence and increased failure risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidfailure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The VBR apparatus transitions from a rigid static structure to a dynamic resilient structure through the incorporation of a spring portion with struts and hanging beams. This resilient support member allows controlled deformation and elastic recovery, enabling the apparatus to adapt to physiological movements while maintaining structural integrity and distributing loads dynamically to prevent subsidence and failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the VBR apparatus by introducing elasticity through the spring portion. The resilient support member exhibits variable stiffness and controlled compliance, allowing the apparatus to transition between rigid support and flexible adaptation modes, thereby optimizing both strength and reliability under different loading conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid VBR apparatus is used, then implant stability is achieved, but forces are not efficiently distributed leading to increased stress on adjacent vertebrae

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplant stabilityVSAvoidforce distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient support member with spring portion enables dynamic force distribution by deforming under load and returning to original shape. This dynamic behavior allows the apparatus to distribute forces evenly across the bone-contacting surfaces and adjacent vertebrae, preventing stress concentration while maintaining implant stability through elastic recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If a static VBR apparatus is used, then surgical implantation is simplified, but bone graft growth stimulation is insufficient due to lack of mechanical signaling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical implantationVSAvoidbone graft growth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring portion with struts and hanging beams creates controlled micromotions and mechanical signaling that stimulate bone graft growth. The resilient support member's elastic deformation under physiological loads provides mechanical stimuli that enhance osteogenesis and fusion, while the overall apparatus remains sufficiently stable to facilitate straightforward surgical implantation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a resilient support member with spring portion is incorporated, then force distribution and bone graft growth stimulation are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce distribution efficiencyVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient support member is segmented into discrete functional components: struts providing structural framework and spring portion providing elasticity. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while maintaining overall apparatus simplicity and manufacturability, balancing improved force distribution with controlled device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dynamic VBR apparatus effectively distributes forces, stimulates bone graft growth, and reduces the risk of subsidence by maintaining elasticity and constant contact with adjacent vertebrae, enhancing the fusion process and implant stability.

Implementation Method 1

a spring portion (164) configured to deflect when a force is applied to the VBR apparatus (100, 100a)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9610173B2Vertebral body replacement apparatus
Publication Date: 2017.04.04 DEPUY SYNTHES PROD INC
  • US9610173B2 patent drawing
  • US9610173B2 patent drawing
  • US9610173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vertebral body replacement apparatus includes an outer body member having a first end, a second end, and an opening, and an inner body member having a first end, a second end, and an inner surface defining an opening. The first end of the inner body member is received in the opening of the outer body member such that the inner body member and the outer body member are movable relative to one another. A support member has a first end secured within the inner body member and a second end extending a distance beyond the inner body member. The second end of the support member deflects relative to the first end of the outer body member in response to a force applied thereto and returns to a substantially non-deflected condition upon release of the force.