Vertical Cannabis Cultivation Tray System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for cultivating cannabis plants are not scalable, cost-effective, or efficient in producing consistent high-quality cannabis, as they require large areas, struggle with climate control, and lack automated nutrient recycling and separate growth phases for vegetative and flowering stages, leading to increased operational costs and inconsistent product quality.

Innovation Solution

The method involves growing cannabis plants indoors in vertically stacked trays with separate areas for vegetative and flowering growth, using a recirculating nutrient system, and varying light spectrums to optimize growth phases, allowing for precise control of climate and light exposure, and utilizing energy-efficient lighting systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cannabis plants are grown using conventional outdoor or large-area indoor methods, then plants have sufficient space for growth, but the production density per square foot is low and operational costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction density per square footVSAvoidcultivation area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal ground-based cultivation to vertical three-dimensional stacking of trays at multiple heights. This allows plants to grow upward in vertical columns rather than spreading horizontally, dramatically increasing the number of plants that can be cultivated per square foot of floor space while maintaining adequate growth volume for each plant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Temperature

If large indoor areas are used for cultivation, then climate control is possible, but energy consumption for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclimate controlVSAvoidHVAC energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By stacking trays vertically, the system reduces the horizontal footprint of the cultivation area. This smaller enclosed volume requires less energy for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning while still providing controlled climate conditions for plant growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses adjustable LED lighting with different color temperatures and spectra that can be optimized for different growth stages, reducing energy consumption compared to traditional grow lights while maintaining effective photosynthesis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If nutrients are applied using conventional methods, then plants receive adequate nutrition, but nutrient waste and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenutrient deliveryVSAvoidnutrient waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a recirculating nutrient delivery system where nutrient solution is pumped from a reservoir to the plants and then returned to the reservoir for reuse. This closed-loop feedback system ensures nutrients are continuously recycled and reused, minimizing waste and reducing the amount of fresh nutrient solution needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of discarding used nutrient solution, the system recovers and recirculates it back to the plants through the pump system, maximizing nutrient utilization and reducing operational costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Productivity

If vegetative and flowering growth occur in the same area, then facility complexity is reduced, but product quality consistency and throughput decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidfacility structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates vegetative growth and flowering growth into distinct operational phases using separate rack systems. Plants complete their vegetative phase on one rack system, are then transported to a second rack system for the flowering phase. This segmentation allows optimization of environmental conditions for each growth stage and improves overall product quality consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables cost-effective, high-density cannabis production with improved control over growth conditions, leading to increased yield and consistent THC and CBD concentrations, meeting regulatory standards and reducing operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

The system may include a pump coupled to the first nutrient mixture reservoir and each tray of the plurality of trays. The pump may be configured to deliver a first nutrient mixture to each tray of the plurality of trays.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPump: Pump

Implementation Method 2

flowing a nutrient mixture from a reservoir to the plurality of cannabis plants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

exposing the plurality of cannabis plants to a first artificial light source having a first limited spectrum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotosynthesis: Photosynthesis

Data Source

PatentUS10334796B2Methods and systems of cultivation
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 MJ BRAIN BANK LLC
  • US10334796B2 patent drawing
  • US10334796B2 patent drawing
  • US10334796B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples may include a method of cultivating cannabis plants. The method may include placing a first cannabis plant of a plurality of cannabis plants in a first tray of a plurality of trays. The method may also include placing a second cannabis plant of the plurality of cannabis plants in a second tray of the plurality of trays. The first tray may be at a first height. The second tray may be at a second height, and the first height may be different the second height. Furthermore, the method may include flowing a nutrient mixture from a reservoir to the plurality of cannabis plants. In addition, the method may include returning a portion of the nutrient mixture to the reservoir after flowing the nutrient mixture from the reservoir to the plurality of cannabis plants.