Vertical Electrode MEMS Actuator for Miniaturization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microactuators, particularly micro-mirrors, face challenges in miniaturization and cost reduction while maintaining the ability to generate large forces, as large electrode surfaces are required for capacitive drives, which conflicts with the need for miniaturization.

Innovation Solution

A micro-electromechanical component with an electrically conductive substrate featuring a structured first functional layer with a spring device, a movable first electrode, and a stationary second electrode, allowing for deflection via electrical voltage, along with a production method that includes etching and deposition of dielectric and conductive layers to enable versatile and efficient actuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If large electrode surfaces are used for capacitive drives, then large forces can be produced, but miniaturization and cost reduction are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator forceVSAvoidcomponent size
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from horizontal electrode arrangements to vertical electrodes extending through the substrate thickness. This dimensional change allows the electrode active surface to utilize the substrate's depth dimension, generating large forces while maintaining a compact planar footprint and enabling miniaturization of the overall component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The vertical electrodes are nested within the substrate structure, with the movable electrode device positioned between stationary electrode devices that run vertically through the substrate. This nested arrangement maximizes the electrostatic force-generating surface area within the available volume, resolving the contradiction between force production and miniaturization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Volume of moving object

If all components are miniaturized, then usability is increased and costs are reduced, but large electrode surfaces required for capacitive drives cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent sizeVSAvoidelectrode surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By utilizing the vertical dimension through the substrate rather than expanding horizontal electrode surfaces, the invention achieves miniaturized component dimensions while maintaining sufficient electrode active area for effective capacitive actuation, thus resolving the manufacturing constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If horizontal electrodes are used on a CMOS chip, then micro-mirrors can be moved, but the structure is less versatile and harder to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicro-mirror movementVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional horizontal electrode arrangement by using vertical electrodes extending through the substrate. This inversion simplifies the overall structure, enables easier manufacturing through standard semiconductor processes, and provides greater versatility for different actuator configurations while maintaining micro-mirror movement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for the production of micro-electromechanical components with movable actuator devices that can be driven or detected via vertical electrode devices, enabling small spacings or large actuator sizes, thus facilitating miniaturization and cost reduction while maintaining functionality.

Implementation Method 1

the actuator device being capable of being deflected through the application of an electrical voltage between the first and the second electrode device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

an elastically deflectable actuator device that is suspended via a spring device fashioned in the first functional layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9513476B2Microelectromechanical component and corresponding production method
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9513476B2 patent drawing
  • US9513476B2 patent drawing
  • US9513476B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micro-electromechanical component includes: an electrically conductive substrate having an upper side and an underside; a structured electrically conductive first functional layer fashioned on the upper side of the substrate; an elastically deflectable actuator device suspended via a spring device fashioned in the first functional layer; a movable first electrode device extending vertically through the substrate and connected to the actuator device; and a stationary second electrode device extending vertically through the substrate, at a distance from the first electrode device, the actuator device being configured to be deflected through the application of an electrical voltage between the first and the second electrode device.