Vertical Graphitization Furnace for Consistent Fine-Particle Graphite

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing graphitization processes are inefficient and lack consistency and reproducibility in producing high-quality graphite, particularly for anode materials, and often require additional crushing steps due to large particle sizes.

Innovation Solution

A vertical graphitization furnace with a process chamber housed in a graphite tube jacket, using an electric heating device to maintain a controlled temperature of 2,200 °C to 3,200 °C, and a continuous or intermittent feed and discharge system to maintain a consistent material column, allowing for continuous or intermittent operation with temperature monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If graphitable material with large particle diameters is processed, then the graphitization process can handle coarser material, but the resulting graphite particles are too large for use as anode material and require additional crushing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of material processingVSAvoidadditional crushing step required
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling the particle size distribution of the graphitable material feedstock within specific ranges (d10 ≥ 0.05 mm, d50 ≥ 0.1 mm, d90 ≥ 0.2 mm) and maintaining specific process conditions (temperature gradient, residence time) to achieve graphite particles with optimal size distribution that eliminate the need for crushing while ensuring anode material suitability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If batch processes are used in Acheson furnaces, then polycrystalline graphite can be produced, but the process lacks consistency and reproducibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegraphite production capabilityVSAvoidprocess consistency and reproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous processing where graphitable material is continuously fed into the reaction zone, continuously heated, and continuously discharged as graphite product. This continuous operation with controlled material flow rates and residence times ensures consistent and reproducible graphite quality, eliminating the variability inherent in batch processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback control through temperature monitoring at multiple positions along the reaction zone and adjustment of heating power and material feed rate to maintain optimal processing conditions. This closed-loop control ensures consistent graphite quality and process reproducibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the fill level of material column is not kept constant, then the process operation is simpler, but the graphite quality becomes inconsistent and unreproducible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidgraphite quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback control through level sensors that monitor the fill level of the material column in the reaction zone and automatically adjust the material feed rate to maintain a constant fill level. This ensures consistent graphite quality while the automation maintains operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves self-regulation of the material column fill level through coordinated control of feed conveyor speed and discharge conveyor speed, where the system automatically balances material input and output to maintain optimal fill level without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables energy-efficient production of high-quality graphite with consistent and reproducible quality by maintaining a controlled temperature and material level, reducing the need for additional crushing and improving operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the process tube is heated by means of an electric heating device due to the electrical resistance of the process tube in the area of the heating zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

graphitable material is conveyed through the heating zone of the process chamber, where it is graphitized to graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGraphitization: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentEP4038017B1Process for producing graphite and vertical graphitization furnace
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 ONEJOON GMBH
  • EP4038017B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4038017B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4038017B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a process for producing graphite in a vertical graphitization furnace having at least one process chamber (22) that bounds a heating zone (28), a temperature of 2200°C to 3200°C, especially of 3000°C, is generated in the heating zone (28), particulate graphitizable material (14) is supplied to the process chamber (22) through an inlet (30), graphitizable material (14) is conveyed through the heating zone (28) of the process chamber (22), in which it is graphitized to graphite, and graphite (12) obtained is removed from the process chamber (22) through an outlet (40). As variant A, graphitizable material (14) wherein the particles have a particle size of less than 3 mm is used, and/or, as variant B, a material column (94) is formed throughout the heating zone (28) of a particular process chamber (22), wherein graphitizable material (14), after being supplied through the inlet (30) from the top, trickles through an intake zone (24) of the process chamber (22) onto the material column (94), and/or, as variant C, a material column (94) is formed in a stationary heating zone (98) of a particular process chamber (22) encompassed by the heating zone (28), wherein graphitizable material (14), after being supplied through the intake (30) from the top, trickles through a drop heating zone (96) likewise encompassed by the heating zone (28) onto the material column (94), and/or, as variant D, graphitizable material (14) in one or more material vessels (100) is conveyed through a particular process chamber (22) and through the heating zone (28) thereof. Also specified is a vertical graphitization furnace (10) optimized especially with respect to variants C and D.