Vertical Grow Tower Layouts With Central Processing Flow
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Commercial-scale indoor crop production facilities face challenges in efficiently arranging processing stations and equipment to optimize space utilization, reduce operational and capital costs, and ensure compliance with fire and building regulations.
Innovation Solution
A controlled environment agriculture system with consolidated utility and plant production zones, featuring vertical grow towers and conveyance mechanisms, along with a central processing system for crop preparation, harvesting, and cleaning, optimized by a control system for environmental conditions and automated conveyance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Area of stationary object
If traditional agriculture layouts are used, then space utilization is low, but facility complexity and cost are also reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transitions from traditional horizontal agriculture layouts to a vertical three-dimensional facility configuration. Grow towers are arranged vertically with multiple levels, allowing crops to be grown in stacked configurations. This dimensional change dramatically increases space utilization per footprint while the automated conveyance system manages the increased complexity through standardized vertical module design.
Solution Approach 2:
The facility is divided into discrete functional zones (seeding station, propagation facilities, controlled growth environment, harvesting station, packaging stations) that are spatially segmented and independently optimized. Each zone contains specific equipment and performs dedicated functions, allowing for modular design and efficient space utilization while reducing overall system complexity through functional decomposition.
2Adaptability or versatility
If processing stations are dispersed throughout the facility, then operational flexibility is improved, but space utilization and operational efficiency deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
Multiple processing functions are merged into consolidated stations located in optimized positions. The seeding station, propagation facilities, and controlled growth environment are integrated into a cohesive production flow. Harvesting and packaging stations are combined in the central processing system, reducing the number of discrete locations while maintaining operational flexibility through automated conveyance between merged functions.
Solution Approach 2:
The central processing system serves multiple functions including harvesting, cleaning, and packaging operations. The automated conveyance system provides universal service to all processing zones, transporting crop-bearing modules between different functional areas. This multi-functionality reduces the need for specialized equipment at each dispersed location while maintaining operational adaptability.
3Productivity
If automated processing systems are implemented, then productivity and operational efficiency are improved, but device complexity and capital expenditures increase
Solution Approach 1:
The automated conveyance system operates with minimal human intervention, self-managing the transport of crop-bearing modules between processing zones. The system includes automated control mechanisms that regulate module movement, positioning, and transfer between stations. This self-service capability maximizes productivity while the standardized modular design keeps system complexity manageable through repetition of proven components.
Solution Approach 2:
Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated control systems that manage the conveyance and processing functions. The automated system uses controlled mechanisms rather than manual labor for tasks such as module transport, positioning, and transfer between processing stations. This substitution increases productivity while the modular architecture prevents complexity from becoming unmanageable.
4Area of stationary object
If vertical grow towers are used, then space utilization is improved, but manufacturing complexity and equipment requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The vertical grow towers employ a nested modular structure where standardized components are stacked and integrated vertically. Each tower level contains nested functional elements (grow chambers, lighting, irrigation) that are pre-assembled and then stacked to form the complete vertical structure. This nesting approach maximizes space utilization while simplifying manufacturing through modular assembly of standardized parts.
Solution Approach 2:
Tower modules are pre-assembled and pre-configured before being installed in the facility. The standardized vertical modules include pre-integrated lighting, irrigation, and structural components that are manufactured separately and then assembled on-site. This preliminary action reduces on-site manufacturing complexity while achieving high space utilization through precise vertical stacking.
Data Source
AI summary
Facility layouts and configurations for an automated crop production system for controlled environment agriculture. In particular implementations, the core of the facility comprises a controlled growth environment and a central processing system. The controlled growth environment includes systems for exposing crops housed in modules, such as grow towers, to controlled environmental conditions. The central processing system may include various stations and functionality both for preparing crop-bearing modules to be inserted in the controlled growth environment, for harvesting crops from the crop-bearing modules after they have been extracted from the controlled growth environment, and for cleaning or washing crop-bearing modules for re-use. The controlled growth environment may include vertical farming structure having vertical grow towers and associated conveyance mechanisms for moving the vertical grow towers along one or more grow lines. The conveyance mechanisms may include a return transfer mechanism that creates a return or u-shaped path for each grow line.