Vertical Joint Structure for Lift-In Panel Installation and Repair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing joint systems for substrates, such as wooden boards or panels, require complex horizontal or lay-down motions for installation and repair, which can be cumbersome and inefficient, especially when dealing with damaged panels.

Innovation Solution

A vertical joint system with non-symmetrical joints that allow substrates to engage perpendicular to their major surfaces, enabling easy installation and repair by vertical lifting, and allowing for relative rotation and disengagement of panels while maintaining engagement, using transversely extending surfaces or locking planes to inhibit separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If horizontal or lay-down joint systems are used, then substrates can be joined together, but the installation and repair process becomes cumbersome and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidjoint system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional horizontal engagement approach by implementing vertical engagement where the joint system engages perpendicular to the major surfaces of the substrates. This inversion allows panels to be installed by simply lifting them vertically into place rather than requiring complex horizontal maneuvering, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining joint system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from horizontal engagement (2D plane movement) to vertical engagement (3D perpendicular movement). By changing the dimension of engagement from lateral to vertical, the system enables straightforward installation through vertical lifting motion, eliminating the need for complex horizontal alignment and manipulation required by traditional systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of repair

If traditional joint systems are used, then substrates can be joined, but repair requires extensive disassembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of repairVSAvoidrepair time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The joint system is designed as a segmented, modular connection where individual panels can be independently disengaged by applying vertical force. This segmentation allows damaged panels to be removed and replaced without requiring disassembly of adjacent panels, significantly reducing repair time and effort while maintaining the integrity of the overall substrate assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If vertical lifting is used for installation, then ease of installation is improved, but joint stability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidjoint stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The joint system incorporates curved or cam-shaped surfaces that guide the vertical engagement process. These curved surfaces ensure that as panels are lifted vertically into place, they automatically align and lock together through the geometric progression of the curved interfaces, maintaining joint stability while preserving the simplicity of vertical installation motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS20250270819A1Vertical joint system and associated surface covering system
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 INOTEC INT
  • US20250270819A1 patent drawing
  • US20250270819A1 patent drawing
  • US20250270819A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vertical joint system for substrates is formed with joints which engage by relative motion in a direction perpendicular to major surfaces and of the substrate. The joints are configured to enable relative rotation of up to 3 degrees while maintaining engagement of the joints. The joints are further configured to form two locking planes one on each of the inner and outer most sides of the joint. Engagement about the locking planes is provided by transverse outward extending surfaces. At least one surface in each pair of engaging surfaces is smoothly curved. The joints can be further arranged to provide a third locking plane parallel to and between the locking planes. The joints are disengaged by combination of a downward rotation of one joint relative the other then application of a downward force.