Vertical M.2 Plug-In Holder for PCB Space Reduction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
M.2 module cards occupy a large area on circuit boards due to their size, which is not beneficial for the layout and arrangement of electronic components.
Innovation Solution
A plug-in holder with a frame and engaging structures that allows the M.2 module card to be installed vertically on the circuit board, reducing the occupied area by using a first engaging structure to restrain the card on the frame and second engaging structures to secure it to the board.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If the M.2 module card is installed in a direction parallel to the circuit board, then the card can be easily inserted and removed, but the card occupies a large area on the circuit board
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the installation direction of the M.2 module card from parallel to perpendicular relative to the circuit board. This dimensional change allows the card to be vertically mounted on the circuit board surface, significantly reducing the horizontal area occupied while maintaining the same functional capabilities. The perpendicular orientation enables better space utilization on the circuit board.
2Area of stationary object
If the M.2 module card is installed vertically on the circuit board, then the occupied area is reduced, but the structural complexity increases due to the need for a special holder
Solution Approach 1:
The holder is divided into distinct functional segments: a frame structure for mounting, engaging structures for securing the M.2 card, and positioning features for alignment with the circuit board. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while keeping the overall design modular and manageable, reducing the perceived complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The holder is designed as a multi-functional component that simultaneously provides mechanical support, electrical connection facilitation, and secure attachment to the circuit board. By integrating these multiple functions into a single structure, the design avoids the need for separate components, thereby reducing overall structural complexity while achieving vertical mounting.
3Reliability
If the plug-in holder uses multiple engaging structures, then the stability of the plug-in card is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Multiple engaging structures are integrated into a single holder component rather than being separate parts. The engaging structures are combined with the frame and positioning features in one unified piece, which simplifies the assembly process and reduces the number of manufacturing steps. This merging approach maintains the stability benefits of multiple engagement points while reducing manufacturing complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
A plug-in holder includes a frame, a first engaging structure and at least one second engaging structure. The frame has a first side and a second side, wherein the first side is opposite to the second side. The first engaging structure is located at the first side. The at least one second engaging structure is located at the second side.