Vertical Memory Cell Architecture for Higher Density and Lower Leakage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Planar memory cells face challenges in scaling due to increased complexity and cost as feature sizes approach a lower limit, limiting memory density and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing vertical transistors with multi-gate structures, such as GAA, tri-gate, and double-gate transistors, and arranging memory cell arrays and peripheral circuits on different wafers for bonding, reducing transistor area and simplifying interconnect structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If planar memory cells are scaled to smaller sizes by improving process technology, then memory density is improved, but fabrication complexity and cost increase as feature sizes approach a lower limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar (2D) memory cell architecture to vertical (3D) transistor structures, enabling memory scaling in the vertical dimension rather than continuing to scale lateral feature sizes. This dimensional change allows continued memory density improvement while avoiding the fabrication complexity and cost penalties that arise when planar feature sizes approach physical limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Quantity of substance

If planar memory cells are scaled to smaller sizes, then memory density is improved, but process and fabrication techniques become challenging and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory densityVSAvoidfabrication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By moving to vertical transistors and 3D stacked architectures, the patent enables memory scaling without requiring increasingly complex and costly planar fabrication processes. The vertical structure allows standard fabrication techniques to be applied in the vertical dimension, maintaining manufacturing ease while achieving higher density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of moving object

If memory cells use vertical transistors with multi-gate structures, then transistor area is reduced and memory density is enhanced, but device structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor areaVSAvoidtransistor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical transistor structure with multi-gate configurations (such as gate-all-around or gate-tri-around) controls the channel in the vertical dimension, achieving superior gate control and reduced area occupation. The vertical orientation allows multiple gates to wrap around the channel, providing enhanced control without proportionally increasing the planar footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The vertical transistor employs composite material structures including semiconductor layers, dielectric layers, and conductive gates arranged in vertical stacks. This composite architecture enables compact integration while maintaining electrical performance, reducing the area required per transistor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Manufacturing precision

If memory cell arrays and peripheral circuits are arranged on different wafers and bonded, then interconnect structures are simplified and alignment precision is improved, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the memory device into separate functional modules: memory cell arrays fabricated on one wafer and peripheral circuits on another wafer. These segmented modules are then bonded together through precise alignment and bonding processes. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized and fabricated independently, improving overall alignment precision and manufacturing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bonding interface between separate wafers acts as an intermediary connection, enabling modular integration of memory arrays and peripheral circuits. This intermediary bonding structure simplifies interconnect design compared to monolithic integration, as it allows independent optimization of each module while achieving precise alignment through the bonding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250311242A1Memory device and operation method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 YANGTZE MEMORY TECH CO LTD
  • US20250311242A1 patent drawing
  • US20250311242A1 patent drawing
  • US20250311242A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor device and method for forming thereof is provided. The semiconductor device includes a first semiconductor structure and a second semiconductor structure. The first semiconductor structure includes a peripheral circuit. The second semiconductor structure includes memory cells each having a vertical transistor and a storage unit coupled to the vertical transistor. The vertical transistor includes a semiconductor layer extending along a vertical direction and a gate structure coupled to the semiconductor layer. A leakage value of the semiconductor layer is lower than a pico-ampere. The first semiconductor structure is bonded with the second semiconductor structure, and the vertical transistor is between the peripheral circuit and the storage unit.