Vertically Draining Particulate Confinement for Artificial Turf

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional artificial turf systems for playgrounds face challenges in providing adequate shock absorption and water drainage while minimizing the need for a top dressing infill layer, which often results in uneven surfaces and increased installation complexity and cost.

Innovation Solution

A vertically draining particulate confinement structure that prevents side-to-side migration of particulate materials, ensuring consistent fill depth and incorporating a three-dimensional confinement system with elastomeric particulate fillers to enhance shock attenuation and water drainage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a sand/rubber infill layer is used to absorb shock, then shock absorption capability is improved, but HIC (Head Injury Criteria) requirements cannot be met and the infill layer becomes a nuisance causing discomfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorption capabilityVSAvoidhead injury risk and discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the problematic top-dressing infill layer from the artificial turf system while retaining shock absorption capability through the underlying foam underlayment and pile structure. This extraction eliminates the nuisance of loose particulate getting into shoes and clothing while maintaining safety performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite structure combining foam underlayment material with artificial turf pile and backing layers to achieve shock absorption without requiring separate infill materials. The composite design integrates multiple functions into a unified system that meets HIC requirements without loose particulate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If crumb rubber is used as an underlayment to attenuate shock, then shock attenuation is improved, but the underlayment becomes mobile causing side to side migration and uneven surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock attenuation capabilityVSAvoidsurface uniformity and positional stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a foam underlayment that acts as a flexible continuous layer beneath the artificial turf, providing shock attenuation while maintaining dimensional stability. This flexible film-like structure prevents the migration issues associated with loose crumb rubber while preserving cushioning properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite system where the foam underlayment is integrated with the artificial turf structure, forming a unified assembly that prevents relative movement and migration. This composite design ensures both shock attenuation and surface uniformity are maintained during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If binder materials are added to crumb rubber underlayment to prevent migration, then positional stability is improved, but installation becomes difficult and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderlayment positional stabilityVSAvoidinstallation simplicity and time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a pre-formed foam underlayment sheet that provides stability through its continuous structure rather than requiring binders. This flexible film approach allows for simple installation by laying the sheet in place without mixing or bonding operations, significantly reducing installation time and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional underlayment pads made from natural materials are used, then installation is simplified, but the material deteriorates and degrades over a relatively short period of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation simplicityVSAvoidservice life and durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces natural fiber underlayment with a synthetic foam material that combines durability and longevity with the installation simplicity of a pre-formed pad. This synthetic composite maintains the ease of installation while providing extended service life and resistance to degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Strength

If a thick mat with coarse sand granules is used to resist compacting, then shock absorbency is improved, but water drainage becomes inadequate for outdoor installations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorbency and compact resistanceVSAvoidwater drainage capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a foam underlayment with an open-cell porous structure that provides shock absorption while allowing water to drain through vertically. This porous architecture maintains cushioning properties without blocking water flow, solving the drainage problem of dense sand-filled mats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite system where the porous foam underlayment is integrated with the artificial turf structure, combining shock absorption and water drainage functions in a single unified layer that performs both functions effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the risk of head injuries by achieving improved shock absorption and water drainage, maintaining a uniform surface, and simplifying installation while reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

absorb shock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

elastomeric particulate fillers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

vertically draining particulate confinement structure that prevents side-to-side migration of particulate materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 4

vertically draining

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity-driven drainage: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9194086B1System and method for absorbing shocks impacts while providing water drainage
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 KARMIE DALE
  • US9194086B1 patent drawing
  • US9194086B1 patent drawing
  • US9194086B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vertically draining, particulate confinement structure may prevent side to side migration of particulate materials and may provide a way to ensure a consistent fill depth of the particulate materials. The particulate materials may include rubber granules. The vertical draining feature of the system may prevent water from accumulating on the turf surface by providing adequate vertical drainage. The vertical draining feature may be attributed to the combination of the turf surface with a confinement structure and the particulate materials that support this turf surface. The confinement structure and particulate materials also inhibit underlayment migration of the turf surface.