Semi-Automated Vessel Brewing System with Linear Actuator Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vessel-in-vessel brewing methods require manual labor and physical exertion, lack automation, and are inefficient in sparging and precision timing, preventing full automation from strike to boil and continuous sparging or precision timed cooking.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated vessel-in-vessel beer brewing and precision timed cooking system that uses linear actuators, temperature sensors, and electronic control mechanisms to automate the brewing process, enabling hands-off operation, efficient sparging, and precision timed cooking by integrating existing components with minimal additional parts and engineering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual labor is used for vessel-in-vessel brewing operations, then the system structure remains simple, but the ease of operation deteriorates and physical exertion is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with automated systems. Linear actuators automatically lower and raise the inner vessel, eliminating the need for manual lifting and positioning. This substitution improves ease of operation while adding controlled complexity through automation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service through automated control. The microprocessor controls the linear actuators to automatically complete brewing steps without human intervention, allowing the system to serve itself and improving operational ease while maintaining manageable complexity through integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual sparging is used, then the device complexity remains low, but the productivity deteriorates and sparging efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous sparging by automatically lowering the inner vessel to enable continuous water flow through the grain bed. This continuous action improves productivity and sparging efficiency compared to manual batch sparging, while the complexity is managed through automated control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual sparging operations are replaced with automated linear actuator control that enables continuous water flow and grain bed manipulation. This substitution improves productivity and sparging efficiency while adding controlled complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If manual lifting of inner vessel is used, then the device complexity remains simple, but the ease of operation deteriorates and physical strength is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual lifting with linear actuators that automatically raise and lower the inner vessel. This eliminates the need for physical strength and improves ease of operation, while the added complexity is managed through integrated control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Extent of automation

If conventional vessel-in-vessel brewing is used, then the device complexity remains low, but the extent of automation deteriorates and human attention is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextent of automationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual operations with automated linear actuators and microprocessor control throughout the brewing process. This significantly increases the extent of automation, allowing hands-off operation while managing complexity through integrated electronic control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves self-service automation where the microprocessor controls all brewing steps automatically. This maximizes the extent of automation and allows the system to operate without continuous human attention, while complexity is managed through centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Manufacturing precision

If manual brewing operations are used, then the device complexity remains simple, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates and timing accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision timingVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual timing with microprocessor-controlled automated operations. The microprocessor precisely controls the timing of all brewing steps, significantly improving timing accuracy and manufacturing precision while managing complexity through electronic control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system fully automates the brewing process from strike to boil, enhances sparging efficiency, and allows for precision timed cooking, reducing physical demands and improving repeatability and functionality compared to conventional methods.

Implementation Method 1

The heating element heats water to a threshold temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

the pump moves water from the water source to the inner vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPumping: Pump

Implementation Method 3

the linear actuators move the inner vessel between the water source and the outer vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear actuation: Linear Motor

Implementation Method 4

brewing process... extracting compounds from grain into water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExtraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS11920113B1Semi-automated vessel-in-vessel beer brewing and precision timed cooking system
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 HABER NOAH AVRAM
  • US11920113B1 patent drawing
  • US11920113B1 patent drawing
  • US11920113B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semi-automated vessel-in-vessel beer brewing and precision timed cooking system is disclosed. This system enables automated, hands-off brewing from strike to boil, more efficient sparging, and precision timed cooking, and can be built as an add-on to existing vessel-in-vessel systems.