Vessel Closure Inspection via Continuous Conveyance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for checking vessel occlusions in block machines require additional mechanical elements to separate and re-compress closures, leading to inefficiencies and potential failures, especially when dealing with defective occlusions that can cause production line stoppages and material loss.

Innovation Solution

A method where vessel occlusions are guided past a control device without separation, using a conveying medium, allowing for inline checking with optoelectronic sensors and automated evaluation, eliminating the need for additional mechanical elements and enabling dynamic pressure guidance, which simplifies the process and reduces mechanical complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If vessel occlusions are separated in front of the control device using additional mechanical elements, then the control device can check each occlusion individually, but the device complexity increases and the system becomes more prone to failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the separation function from the mechanical element domain and extracts it to the control domain. The control device now performs the separation function through controlled ejection of defective occlusions, eliminating the need for complex mechanical separation elements while maintaining inspection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical separation elements with a control-based ejection system. Instead of using mechanical devices to physically separate and position each occlusion, the system uses the control device to identify and eject only the defective occlusions, substituting mechanical complexity with intelligent control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If additional mechanical elements are provided to separate and re-compress vessel occlusions, then individual checking is enabled, but the reliability decreases due to potential failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the separation function from mechanical elements and transfers it to the control system. By removing mechanical separation components, the system eliminates their associated failure points while maintaining the ability to check each occlusion individually through controlled ejection of defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The conveying medium serves its primary function of transporting occlusions while simultaneously enabling the ejection of defective items. The system uses the existing conveying infrastructure to achieve both transport and defect removal functions, reducing the need for additional mechanical elements that could fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If vessel occlusions are guided at higher speed to compensate for separation time, then productivity is maintained, but the complexity and reliability issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous conveyance of vessel occlusions through the inspection zone without interruption for separation. The conveying medium continuously transports occlusions at optimal speed, and defective items are ejected on-the-fly, eliminating stoppages and maintaining full productivity without requiring high-speed mechanical separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces high-speed mechanical separation with a control-based ejection system that operates during normal conveyance. Instead of requiring rapid mechanical actions to separate and re-compress occlusions, the system uses controlled ejection during continuous transport, maintaining productivity while reducing mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2295157B1Method and device for controlling container seals
Publication Date: 2015.12.23 KRONES AG
  • EP2295157B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2295157B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2295157B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention comprises a method for checking vessel closures with a control device, comprising the steps of passing the vessel closures past the control device by means of a conveying medium without singulating the vessel closures in front of the control device, and checking the vessel closures with the control device.