Vessel Navigation Rule Estimation for Transparent Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing navigation systems fail to clearly clarify actions that comply with various rules applicable to vessel navigation and the reasons for those determinations, often lacking reliability and failing to consider differences in rules based on surrounding conditions, leading to potential safety issues and non-compliance with legal regulations.

Innovation Solution

A navigation assistance system that includes a rule estimation logic storage, own ship and target data acquirers, situational awareness data generator, relative relationship specifier, and rule estimator to determine applicable rules based on the relative relationship between the own ship and targets, ensuring compliance with COLREG and other navigation rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If conventional collision avoidance route suggestion technologies are used, then collision avoidance routes can be provided, but the actions and reasons for compliance with navigation rules are not clearly clarified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclarity of rule compliance informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of rule compliance analysis into distinct functional modules: rule estimation logic storage, own ship setting data storage, situational awareness data generation, relative relationship specification, and rule estimation. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, making the overall system more manageable and transparent while clearly clarifying the actions and reasons for rule compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If collision avoidance routes are generated without considering surrounding conditions, then route generation is simplified, but compliance with navigation rules cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverule compliance reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing rule estimation logic and own ship setting data in advance, and by generating situational awareness data before rule estimation. This preliminary processing ensures that when collision avoidance routes are generated, the system already has the necessary contextual information about surrounding conditions, water areas, and visibility states to ensure rule compliance reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Extent of automation

If AI is used for decision-making from target detection to collision avoidance, then automation is improved, but the processes and reasons become a black box and unclear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making automationVSAvoidtransparency of decision processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by generating situational awareness data that explicitly captures the state of surrounding conditions, water area characteristics, and visibility. This feedback loop ensures that the automated decision-making process is transparent, as the rule estimator can trace back through the situational awareness data to understand the reasons for its recommendations, preventing the black box problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If navigation rules are applied without considering water area and weather conditions, then rule application is simplified, but safety and compliance cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverule application simplicityVSAvoidsafety and compliance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by storing and processing own ship setting data that includes specific parameters for different water areas and weather conditions. The rule estimation logic is tailored to local conditions, allowing the system to automatically adapt the application of navigation rules based on the specific situation, thereby maintaining both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4722097A1Navigation assistance system
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 MITSUI O S K LINES LTD
  • EP4722097A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4722097A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4722097A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A navigation assistance system (1) stores therein rule estimation logic for estimating a relationship in application of a rule to conduct of a vessel, and own ship setting data including a parameter indicating a characteristic of an own ship, and acquires own ship data indicating information on a state of the own ship, acquires target data indicating information on a state of a target, acquires surrounding data indicating information on a state of surrounding of the own ship, generates situational awareness data indicating a situation for determining an action of the own ship, based on the own ship data, the target data, and the surrounding data, specifies a relative relationship between the own ship and the target, based on the situational awareness data, and estimates an applicable rule to be applied to the own ship, based on the specified relative relationship and the own ship setting data, in accordance with the rule estimation logic.