Marine Vessel Steering Stabilization for Smooth Docking Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated docking assistance systems in marine vessels often experience delays in compensating for changing wind conditions, leading to a 'tug-of-war' and oscillating movements between the system and the operator, resulting in undesired aggressive acceleration and braking during docking.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a steering control device, a model simulation device, and a control unit that synchronizes the marine vessel's actual and simulated positions and headings, using control signals to stabilize propulsion based on the difference between real-time and simulated data, allowing for smoother and more stable docking operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the automated docking assistance system activates itself based on joystick movement, then the system can compensate for wind conditions and misalignment, but it causes a delay in compensation and creates a tug-of-war between the system and operator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem response to wind conditionsVSAvoiddelay in compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously simulating vessel behavior in advance using a model simulation device. This allows the control unit to predict how the vessel will respond to control inputs before actually applying them, enabling proactive compensation for wind conditions and misalignment rather than reactive compensation after the operator has already moved the joystick.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by using a dynamic model simulation that continuously updates based on current vessel state, wind conditions, and control inputs. The simulation dynamically adjusts the predicted vessel behavior, allowing the system to adapt its compensation strategy in real-time without causing delays or tug-of-war situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If the automated docking assistance system attempts to reach velocity as fast as possible, then it responds quickly to control inputs, but it causes aggressive acceleration that requires operator correction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse velocityVSAvoidaggressive acceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies beforehand cushioning by using the model simulation device to predict the vessel's acceleration response to control inputs before actually commanding that acceleration. The control unit compares the simulated response with desired smooth docking behavior and adjusts the control signals to cushion or dampen aggressive acceleration, preventing harmful oscillations before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously comparing the simulated vessel behavior with the actual vessel state and adjusting control signals accordingly. The control unit uses the difference between simulated and actual position and heading to fine-tune propulsion control, ensuring smooth acceleration without aggressive movements that would require operator correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the automated docking assistance system and operator both control the vessel simultaneously, then the system provides automated stabilization, but it causes oscillating compensating movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated stabilizationVSAvoidvessel movement stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The model simulation device acts as an intermediary between the operator's control inputs and the actual vessel control. Instead of the operator directly controlling the vessel alongside the automated system, the simulation serves as a mediator that predicts outcomes and allows the control unit to harmonize automated stabilization with operator intentions, preventing oscillating compensating movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4703837A1System and method for steering control stabilization of a marine vessel
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 CPAC SYST
  • EP4703837A1 patent drawingFigure 1~3B
  • EP4703837A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP4703837A1 patent drawingFigure 6

AI summary

A system and a method therein for steering control stabilization of a marine vessel is provided. The system comprises a steering control device, a control unit and a model simulation device. The steering control device provides control signals in response to manual control inputs from an operator of the marine vessel to the model simulation device. The model simulation device applies the control signals to a simulated model of a marine vessel and provide a resulting position and heading, and their respective rate of change, of the simulated model of the marine vessel to the control unit. The control unit controls a propulsion system of the marine vessel based on a difference between a real-time current position and heading, and their respective rate of change, of the marine vessel and the resulting position and heading, and their respective rate of change, of the simulated model of the marine vessel.