Vessel Stenosis Quantification Through Time-Window Pressure Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for quantifying stenosis in vessels, such as coronary arteries, require additional hardware and prolonged adenosine infusions, leading to prolonged procedural times and patient discomfort, and lack sufficient inter-operator and intra-operator reproducibility.

Innovation Solution

A data processing system that calculates a functional outcome index (FOI) based on pressure values measured during a pullback time period, determining a time window and maximum pressure change without precise positional references, using a movable pressure sensor and optionally a stationary sensor, to quantify stenosis, stricture, or lesion in vessels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If precise positional information is obtained through motorized pullbacks or medical imaging, then the functional outcome index can be determined with sufficient reproducibility, but additional hardware is required and procedural time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of functional outcome indexVSAvoidadditional hardware requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential information needed for reproducibility (pressure values and time duration) from the complex system of motorized pullbacks and medical imaging. By focusing only on the critical parameters (pressure measurements over a defined time window) and eliminating the need for precise positional tracking hardware, the solution achieves reproducibility without additional device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical systems (motorized pullback mechanisms, medical imaging equipment) with a time-based data processing approach. Instead of using complex hardware to track position, the invention uses temporal analysis of pressure values to achieve the same reproducibility goal through computational methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If precise positional information is obtained through motorized pullbacks or medical imaging, then the functional outcome index can be determined with sufficient reproducibility, but procedural time is prolonged due to prolonged adenosine infusions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of functional outcome indexVSAvoidprocedural time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential temporal parameter (time window duration) from the complex procedural requirements. By eliminating the need for prolonged adenosine infusions and complex positioning procedures, the invention reduces procedural time while maintaining reproducibility through focused time-based analysis of pressure data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent skips the time-consuming steps of achieving and maintaining prolonged hyperaemic conditions with adenosine infusions. Instead, it uses a shorter, defined time window approach that captures the necessary pressure data more quickly, thereby reducing overall procedural time while preserving measurement reproducibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Reliability

If pressure measurements are obtained during hyperaemic conditions, then more reliable and reproducible pressure measurements are achieved, but the time period and impact of hyperaemic agent increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of pressure measurementsVSAvoidtime period for hyperaemic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temporal parameter of hyperaemic condition exposure by using a shorter, defined time window (e.g., 5-10 seconds) instead of prolonged hyperaemia. This parameter change maintains the reliability of pressure measurements during the critical measurement period while reducing the total time and impact of hyperaemic agent exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a limited time window of hyperaemic conditions rather than sustained hyperaemia. This partial approach provides sufficient reliable data during the measurement window without the excessive time commitment and patient discomfort associated with prolonged hyperaemic agent administration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250261861A1A Data Processing System and Computer Implemented Method for Quantifying a Stenosis in a Vessel
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 ARTERIAX BV
  • US20250261861A1 patent drawing
  • US20250261861A1 patent drawing
  • US20250261861A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing system and computer implemented method for quantifying a stenosis in a vessel.There is described a data processing system (30), which receives a dataset (32) comprising a set of pressure values measured during a pullback time period (40), the pullback time period (40) corresponding to the time period during which the set of pressure values were determined from measurements of a movable pressure sensor (22) while moving along a part (12) of a vessel (10). Based on a time window (42) of which the duration corresponds to a fraction of the pullback time period, there is calculated a maximum of the moving time window (42) pressure change (26) based on said dataset (32) of said part (12) of said vessel (10).