VFET Contact Liner Layout for nFET/pFET Resistance Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for forming contact liners in vertical field-effect transistors (VFETs) face challenges in selecting proper silicides and liners for source/drain epitaxial regions, leading to increased costs due to additional lithographic steps and cross-contamination between nFET and pFET devices.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method involves forming a VFET structure with a first VFET having a single liner between the source/drain epi and contact, and a second VFET with two liners, allowing for proper contact liner matching between differing VFET devices, including pFET and nFET devices, while minimizing process steps by using a titanium liner with pFET dopants and optimizing the placement and number of liners to prevent cross-contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If additional lithographic steps are used to select proper silicides and liners for source/drain epitaxial regions, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact liner matchingVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the VFET structures into distinct first and second VFETs with different liner configurations. The first VFET receives a first liner while the second VFET receives a second liner, allowing independent optimization of contact properties for each device type without requiring additional lithographic steps to differentiate the liner selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different liner materials and configurations to different locations (first VFET vs. second VFET) based on their specific electrical requirements. The first liner and second liner are specifically tailored for their respective VFET types, enabling local optimization of contact resistance and electrical properties without affecting other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If additional lithographic steps are used to form proper contact liners, then contact resistance tuning is improved, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact resistance tuningVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary doping of the liner materials during the liner formation step itself. The first liner is doped with a first dopant and the second liner is doped with a second dopant during their respective deposition processes, eliminating the need for subsequent separate doping steps and reducing overall production costs while achieving the desired contact resistance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the electrical parameters of the liners by incorporating different dopants (first dopant for first liner, second dopant for second liner) and varying their thicknesses. This allows precise tuning of contact resistance and electrical properties to match the specific requirements of each VFET type without requiring additional process steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If uniform liner configuration is used for all VFETs, then process simplicity is maintained, but cross-contamination between nFET and pFET devices occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess stepsVSAvoidcross-contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the liner formation process into separate treatments for first VFETs and second VFETs. By applying the first liner to first VFETs and the second liner to second VFETs with different configurations and dopants, the process prevents cross-contamination between nFET and pFET devices while maintaining overall process simplicity through concurrent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality control by providing different liner materials and dopant configurations specifically where needed (first VFET vs. second VFET regions). This prevents harmful cross-contamination effects by ensuring each VFET type receives the appropriate liner protection and electrical properties without affecting adjacent device types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables effective silicide formation for nFET and pFET devices without additional lithographic steps, ensuring proper contact liner matching and minimizing cross-contamination, thus improving the tuning of contact resistance and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

performing a first ion implantation on the second source/drain epi to form an implanted source/drain epi

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon implantation: Ion Implantation

Data Source

PatentUS11908907B2VFET contact formation
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11908907B2 patent drawing
  • US11908907B2 patent drawing
  • US11908907B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention may include a Vertical Field Effect Transistor (VFET) structure, and method of making that structure, having a first VFET and a second VFET. The first VFET may include a single liner between a first source/drain epi and a contact. The second VFET may include two liners between a second source/drain epi and a contact. This may enable proper contact liner matching for differing VFET devices.