Vial Closure Assembly Anti-Rotation Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vial closure assemblies face challenges in maintaining a leak-tight seal due to manufacturing tolerances and dimensional variations, leading to potential breaches when the cover and stopper rotate relative to the vial, which complicates secure and stable closure.

Innovation Solution

A vial closure assembly comprising a ring, cover, and shell with locking tabs and a sliding rail system that prevents rotation of the stopper relative to the vial, utilizing an elastomeric stopper and a polymer outer shell to minimize friction and torque transfer, ensuring secure sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking cover is used to seal the stopper, then the isolation of vial contents is improved, but manufacturing tolerances and dimensional variations cause incorrect locking and potential rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal integrityVSAvoiddimensional variations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The friction reduction element changes the friction parameter between the locking cover and presser plate, transforming it from a high-friction interface to a low-friction interface. This allows the locking cover to move freely during pressing without accumulating friction that would cause misalignment or rotation, while still achieving secure locking through the tab-and-slot mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The friction reduction element acts as an intermediary between the locking cover and presser plate, mediating the interaction by reducing frictional forces. This intermediary component allows the locking cover to slide smoothly during the locking process while maintaining secure engagement through the tab-and-slot mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If friction is reduced between the locking cover and presser plate, then correct locking is improved, but rotational movement of the cover and stopper may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking processVSAvoidrotational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into distinct functional zones: the friction reduction element handles axial movement during pressing, while the tab-and-slot mechanism handles rotational prevention. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one function, achieving both smooth operation and rotational stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tab-and-slot mechanism uses asymmetric geometry where the tab fits into a slot with specific orientation. This asymmetric design allows free axial movement during pressing while preventing rotational movement, as rotation would require the tab to pass through the slot in an impossible geometric configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Reliability

If the cover is securely locked to prevent rotation, then seal integrity is improved, but friction creates resistance to movement during locking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal integrityVSAvoidfriction resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The friction reduction element is positioned to engage before the locking cover reaches its final locked position. This preliminary action reduces friction during the movement phase, allowing smooth operation, while the tab-and-slot mechanism engages at the appropriate moment to prevent rotation and ensure seal integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the likelihood of seal breaches by stabilizing the stopper position and preventing rotation, thereby maintaining a secure and leak-tight seal, even with variations in manufacturing tolerances and container dimensions.

Implementation Method 1

The upper lip includes at least one rail for sliding contact with a top surface of the second top wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12071279B2Vial closure assembly
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES INC
  • US12071279B2 patent drawing
  • US12071279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vial closure assembly for sealing a container includes a ring, a cap, a shell, and an optional cover. The ring has a first top wall defining a first through-opening and a skirt extending downwardly from the first top wall that includes a plurality of locking tabs. The cover includes a second top wall defining a second through-opening, a sidewall extending downwardly from the second top wall, and an interior cavity defined by the second top wall and the sidewall. The cap includes a plurality of tabs configured to engage the first or second top wall. The shell includes a body having an inwardly radially extending upper and lower lip. The upper lip includes at least one rail for sliding contact with a top surface of either the first or second top wall.