Vibrating Mill Uranium Dioxide Powder Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The variability in sinterability of uranium dioxide powders, particularly those from 'wet' and 'dry' processes, leads to inconsistent nuclear fuel pellet dimensions and sintering behavior, requiring complex adjustments and resulting in material loss and health risks due to fine dust production.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a vibrating mill to mix uranium dioxide powders from different synthesis processes, fragmenting agglomerates and aggregates while preserving crystallite size, resulting in a particulate material with consistent sinterability and compressibility, independent of initial powder aggregation states and shaping stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If powders from different synthesis processes (wet and dry) are used, then powder availability and process flexibility are improved, but sinterability consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowder availabilityVSAvoidsinterability consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by subjecting powders from different synthesis processes to a common mechanical treatment regime (vibration, agitation, controlled grinding) that standardizes their physical parameters (particle size distribution, morphology, aggregation state) while preserving their chemical composition. This allows powders from wet and dry processes to achieve consistent sinterability despite their different origins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by applying a pre-treatment step before sintering that includes mechanical agitation, vibration, and controlled grinding. This preliminary processing homogenizes the powder characteristics (breaking aggregates, optimizing particle size distribution) so that the subsequent sintering process yields consistent results regardless of the powder's original synthesis method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If complex adjustments are made to compensate for powder variability, then sinterability consistency is improved, but process complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesinterability consistencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses preliminary action to standardize powder properties before sintering through a defined sequence of mechanical treatments (agitation, vibration, grinding). This pre-processing eliminates the need for complex real-time adjustments during sintering, as the powder is prepared in advance to have uniform characteristics that ensure consistent sintering behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the physical state of the powder through controlled mechanical energy input (vibration amplitude, grinding intensity, agitation duration). These parameter changes standardize particle size distribution, aggregation state, and surface characteristics, thereby ensuring consistent sinterability without requiring complex process adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If aggressive grinding is applied to fragment aggregates, then sinterability consistency is improved, but crystallite size control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesinterability consistencyVSAvoidcrystallite size
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using controlled, moderate grinding intensity that is sufficient to fragment aggregates and improve sinterability but not excessive enough to significantly reduce crystallite size. The grinding parameters (intensity, duration, media type) are optimized to achieve just the right level of particle size reduction and aggregate breakdown without over-grinding the crystallites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to optimize the balance between aggregate fragmentation and crystallite preservation. By carefully controlling grinding intensity, duration, and the type of grinding media, the process achieves sufficient aggregate breakdown for consistent sinterability while maintaining crystallite integrity and size within acceptable ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If multiple powders from different origins are mixed, then material utilization is improved, but mixing issues and contamination risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial utilizationVSAvoidmixing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing each powder separately (agitation, vibration, grinding) before mixing. This ensures that each powder is in an optimal, homogenized state with controlled aggregation and particle size distribution, which facilitates reliable mixing and reduces contamination risks when combining powders from different origins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes to standardize the physical parameters (particle size, aggregation state, surface characteristics) of powders from different origins through controlled mechanical treatment. This parameter standardization enables reliable mixing and consistent sintering results while maximizing material utilization, as the treated powders behave uniformly in the mixing and sintering processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process ensures reproducible and flexible production of nuclear fuel pellets with consistent dimensions and density, reducing the need for complex adjustments and minimizing material loss and health risks, while allowing for the use of different powder origins without mixing issues.

Implementation Method 1

A method involving a vibrating mill to mix uranium dioxide powders from different synthesis processes, fragmenting agglomerates and aggregates while preserving crystallite size

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

the grinding intensity being sufficient to fragment the agglomerates and aggregates present in the powders without however fragmenting the crystallites present in the powders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical grinding: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP1971987B1Method for making a particulate matter
Publication Date: 2012.09.05 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP1971987B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1971987B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1971987B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention concerns a method for making at least one particulate matter, said method including the following successive steps: a) introducing in a vibrating grinder at least two powders each containing UO2 obtained by two different synthesis methods and having neighbouring specific surfaces; b) stirring the powders in the grinder, to form a particulate matter, the grinding intensity enabling the agglomerates and the aggregates of the powders to be fragmented without the crystallites being fragmented, and the grinding energy being such that all the agglomerates and aggregates are destroyed. The invention also concerns a particulate material obtained by said method.