Vibration Classifier Segmentation for Break-in Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vibration detection systems struggle to accurately differentiate between harmless activities and break-in attempts, leading to false alarms or missed detections, especially when residents are present and windows or doors are open.

Innovation Solution

A method involving discontinuous analysis of vibration signals, split into sub-periods, calculates variation indicators for each component to classify events as break-ins or harmless activities, using a combination of threshold-based and machine learning approaches, and optionally incorporating frequency analysis to enhance accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vibration sensors are used to detect break-ins, then detection capability is improved, but false alarms increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreak-in detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration signal is divided into multiple sub-periods, and each sub-period is analyzed separately to calculate variation indicators. This segmentation allows the system to distinguish between continuous harmless vibrations and discrete break-in attempts, reducing false alarms while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system calculates variation indicators based on changes in vibration parameters across different sub-periods. By analyzing the variation in vibration characteristics rather than absolute values, the system can differentiate between normal activities and break-in attempts, improving reliability while reducing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If indoor motion sensors are used when residents are home, then detection capability is improved, but system reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreak-in detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem usability when residents are present
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The vibration signal is segmented into sub-periods, allowing the system to analyze patterns during different time intervals. This enables the system to distinguish between vibrations caused by residents' normal activities and actual break-in attempts, maintaining high reliability even when residents are present.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors vibration patterns and uses feedback from the variation indicators to adjust its detection threshold. This adaptive feedback mechanism allows the system to learn normal resident behavior patterns and maintain high detection accuracy without false alarms when residents are home.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If continuous vibration monitoring is performed, then detection coverage is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous processing, the system performs vibration monitoring in periodic intervals, dividing the monitoring period into sub-periods. This periodic action maintains detection coverage while significantly reducing power consumption by keeping the processing unit in low-power states between measurement intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring process is segmented into discrete measurement periods with sub-periods for analysis. This segmentation allows the system to maintain comprehensive detection coverage while optimizing power consumption by processing vibrations in manageable, power-efficient intervals rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces false alarms and improves detection accuracy by reliably distinguishing between different types of vibrations, including glass breaking and nail-based attacks, while maintaining low power consumption.

Implementation Method 1

These are used for detecting vibrations that occur when a break-in attempt occurs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration detection: Vibration

Data Source

PatentEP3874479B1Classifying vibrations
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 ASSA ABLOY AB
  • EP3874479B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2B
  • EP3874479B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3874479B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7C

AI summary

It is provided a method for classifying vibrations detected in a structure of a building. The method is performed in a vibration classifier and comprising the steps of: determining a measurement period of a vibration signal; splitting the measurement period in a plurality of sequential sub-periods; calculating, for each one of the sub-periods, a variation indicator of at least one component of the vibration signal; and classifying a source of the vibration signal based on the variation indicators.