Vibration Attribute Curve Correction for Accurate Effect Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies lack accurate methods for evaluating the vibration effect of devices, which affects the quality of user experience.

Innovation Solution

A vibration evaluation method that generates an actual vibration attribute curve, corrects it using delay durations at transformation points, and calculates curve deviation information to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the actual vibration attribute curve is directly used for evaluation, then the evaluation process is simple, but the accuracy of the evaluation result is low due to time difference errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of vibration effect evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by correcting the actual vibration attribute curve before evaluation. Specifically, the system determines delay durations at transformation points in advance, uses these to correct the actual curve to obtain a corrected curve, and then performs evaluation based on the corrected curve. This preliminary correction step eliminates time difference errors before they affect the evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the vibration attribute curve into multiple segments based on transformation points. The system identifies N transformation points on the actual vibration attribute curve, segments the curve accordingly, and determines delay duration for each segment. This segmentation allows precise correction of time differences at each segment while maintaining overall curve accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If delay correction is applied to the actual vibration attribute curve, then the accuracy of curve deviation information is improved, but the complexity of the processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of curve deviation informationVSAvoidcomplexity of curve processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of delay durations at transformation points before calculating curve deviation. By pre-calculating the delay duration for each transformation point and applying corrections in advance, the system ensures that the curve deviation information is based on accurate, time-synchronized data, thereby improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by focusing correction efforts on transformation points rather than uniformly correcting the entire curve. The system identifies specific transformation points where time differences occur, determines delay durations locally at these points, and applies corrections segment-by-segment. This localized approach improves accuracy where it matters most while avoiding unnecessary processing elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If multiple transformation points are used for delay determination, then the correction accuracy is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of delay duration determinationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the vibration attribute curve into multiple segments based on N transformation points. Each segment is independently analyzed to determine its specific delay duration. This segmentation allows the system to capture local variations in delay across different parts of the curve, improving overall correction accuracy while managing computational complexity through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by determining delay duration specifically at each transformation point rather than using a single global delay value. Each transformation point's delay duration is calculated based on local curve characteristics, ensuring high accuracy for that specific segment. This localized determination method improves precision without requiring excessive computational resources across the entire curve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12566101B2Vibration evaluation method and apparatus, computer device, storage medium, and computer program product
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US12566101B2 patent drawing
  • US12566101B2 patent drawing
  • US12566101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of this application provide a vibration evaluation method performed by a computer device. The method includes: generating an actual vibration attribute curve of a target object including reference vibration attribute values at a plurality of timestamps; determining at least one delay duration of N actual transformation points according to a time difference between a reference vibration attribute curve of the reference vibration attribute information and the actual vibration attribute curve; correcting the actual vibration attribute curve by using the delay duration to obtain a corrected vibration attribute curve; and acquiring target curve deviation information between the reference vibration attribute curve and the corrected vibration attribute curve, and adjusting a vibration effect of the target object based on the target curve deviation information. Through this application, the accuracy of an evaluation result of the vibration effect of the target object can be improved.