Vibration Error Screening for Reliable Structural Monitoring Data
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Vibration measurement errors in structural analysis lead to incorrect analysis results and reduced reliability of predictive diagnostics, particularly in nuclear power plants, due to factors like equipment inexperience, external interference, and sensor issues.
Innovation Solution
A vibration measurement error determination method that combines a preset error data selection rule with a machine-learning algorithm to identify measurement errors in vibration data, using principal component analysis and clustering to extract feature information and determine error presence.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If vibration data is collected during the measurement process, then the structure's state can be monitored, but measurement errors may be introduced due to equipment inexperience, external interference, or sensor issues
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by establishing error detection rules and machine learning models before actual vibration measurement and analysis. The system pre-processes vibration data to identify potential measurement errors using predetermined criteria, such as checking for abnormal amplitude values, frequency patterns, or signal characteristics that indicate measurement failures. This preliminary error detection prevents contaminated data from entering the main analysis pipeline, thereby maintaining both measurement reliability and data accuracy throughout the monitoring process.
2Extent of automation
If specialized machine learning is used to analyze vibration data, then analysis capability is enhanced, but the reliability of diagnosis is reduced when measurement error data is present
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces an intermediary error detection and filtering layer between raw vibration data collection and machine learning analysis. This intermediary system uses automated rules and algorithms to identify, flag, or remove measurement error data before it reaches the specialized machine learning models. By acting as a mediator, this layer protects the automated analysis process from being compromised by poor-quality data, thus maintaining both high automation extent and diagnosis reliability simultaneously.
3Duration of action of stationary object
If vibration measurement is performed continuously for predictive diagnosis, then the predictive capability is improved, but the accumulation of measurement error data increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the quality of collected vibration data throughout the extended measurement period. The system uses real-time error detection algorithms to identify degradation in data quality and provides feedback to adjust measurement parameters, trigger re-calibration, or exclude problematic data segments. This feedback loop enables the system to maintain high data quality standards even during continuous long-term monitoring, preventing the accumulation of measurement errors that would otherwise degrade overall data quality.
Data Source
AI summary
A vibration measurement error determination method according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises: a vibration data acquisition step for acquiring vibration data by measuring a vibration generated in a structure; a first determination step for determining, on the basis of a preset error data selection rule, whether the vibration data is data generated by a measurement error; a second determination step for using a machine-learning algorithm to determine whether the vibration data is data generated by a measurement error; and a final determination step for determining, on the basis of the results determined in the first determination step and the second determination step, whether the vibration data is data generated by a measurement error.


