Vibration Fatigue Testing for Composite Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining the vibration fatigue limit of composite materials are ineffective due to their gradual degradation, which differs from the abrupt failure of metals, leading to less accurate stress and strain measurements.

Innovation Solution

A method involving forming a test component, identifying its resonant frequency, applying an excitation force at constant frequency to maintain a response parameter constant, measuring input and output parameters, and iterating until first or second-order derivatives exhibit discontinuities to define the fatigue limit, suitable for use with standard vibration fatigue test equipment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If known vibration fatigue testing methods developed for metals are applied to composite materials, then the testing procedure can be standardized, but the measurement accuracy deteriorates due to the gradual degradation nature of composite materials versus abrupt failure of metals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestandardization of testing procedureVSAvoidfatigue limit determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameter from monitoring critical events (abrupt failure) to monitoring response parameters and their derivatives (gradual degradation). By tracking the first and second order derivatives of response parameters, the method adapts to the progressive nature of composite material degradation while maintaining standardized testing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical failure-based detection method with a mathematical analysis method. Instead of detecting physical critical events, the method uses derivative calculations of response parameters to identify fatigue limits, substituting mechanical observation with computational analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the excitation force is increased to maintain constant response parameter during testing, then the test duration can be reduced, but the stress on the material increases potentially causing premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest durationVSAvoidmaterial stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the response parameter and adjusting the excitation force accordingly. The excitation force is altered to maintain the response parameter constant, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to material degradation in real-time, balancing test efficiency with material preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively determines the vibration fatigue limit of composite materials, metals, and ceramics, providing a gradual degradation assessment and allowing for the prediction of remaining useful life by identifying discontinuities in derivatives, enabling more accurate material life prediction.

Implementation Method 1

identify a resonant frequency of the test component; identify an excitation frequency which causes the test component to vibrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS10379020B2Vibration fatigue testing
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US10379020B2 patent drawing
  • US10379020B2 patent drawing
  • US10379020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method to determine a fatigue limit for a material. Form a test component including the material. Identify a resonant frequency of the component and an excitation frequency which causes the component to vibrate. Measure a response parameter of the component when excited at the excitation frequency. Test the component to determine its fatigue limit by sub-steps to: apply an excitation force to the component at the excitation frequency to cause vibration of the component; alter the applied excitation force at constant excitation frequency to maintain the response parameter constant; measure at least one of an input parameter and an output parameter; iterate the sub-steps to alter and measure until the first order, second order, or first and second order derivatives of the input parameter and/or output parameter exhibit a discontinuity. Repeat the steps for a different excitation frequency. The fatigue limit for the material includes all the identified discontinuities.