Vibration Profile Authentication for Replaceable Accessories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for identifying and authenticating objects, especially small and inexpensive replaceable accessories, are costly and impractical due to the need for microcontrollers, which can increase product costs and are not feasible in all scenarios, such as when space or material constraints are limiting.

Innovation Solution

A method involving vibrating objects at multiple frequencies using a motor and sensing these vibrations with an accelerometer to generate a vibration profile, which is then compared to a stored profile for identification or authentication, allowing for cost-effective authentication of objects and their replaceable accessories without the need for embedded microcontrollers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a microcontroller is embedded in each product for identification and authentication, then object identification and counterfeit detection capability is improved, but product cost significantly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeit detection capabilityVSAvoidproduct cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the identification function from the expensive microcontroller and implements it using only a passive tag containing identification data. The active processing and authentication logic are moved to the main system, allowing the tag itself to be a simple, inexpensive component while still providing secure identification and counterfeit detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a passive tag that contains identification data as a simplified copy of the full authentication system. Instead of embedding a complete microcontroller in each product, a lightweight replica containing only essential identification information is used, which can be read and verified by the main system without requiring full processing capabilities in the tag itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If a microcontroller is embedded in small spare parts for identification, then authentication capability is improved, but the device becomes too large or heavy for the application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidobject weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the identification function from the heavy microcontroller and implements it using a lightweight passive tag. This allows small spare parts to maintain authentication capability while keeping weight and size constraints satisfied, as the passive tag contains minimal material compared to an active microcontroller.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If a microcontroller is embedded in small spare parts for identification, then authentication capability is improved, but available space for the component is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidobject volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the identification function from the bulky microcontroller and implements it using a compact passive tag. This allows authentication capability to be maintained in small spare parts with limited space, as the passive tag occupies minimal volume compared to an active microcontroller with its required circuitry and power supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a passive tag as a simplified copy of the authentication system, containing only essential identification data rather than full processing capabilities. This dramatically reduces the volume required while maintaining authentication functionality through verification by the main system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of manufacture

If traditional identification methods are used for replaceable accessories, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but counterfeit detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcounterfeit detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a passive tag containing identification data as a lightweight copy of the authentication system. This approach maintains manufacturing simplicity compared to embedding microcontrollers, while providing sufficient counterfeit detection capability through verification of the tag's identification data by the main system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a cost-effective means to identify and authenticate objects and their accessories, effectively distinguishing authentic from counterfeit parts, while being suitable for small, inexpensive items where traditional methods are impractical.

Implementation Method 1

vibrating the object at a plurality of frequencies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical vibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

sensing vibrations from the object at each of the plurality of frequencies using an accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer sensing: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11808779B2Method for identifying an object having a replaceable accessary and an object therefor
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US11808779B2 patent drawing
  • US11808779B2 patent drawing
  • US11808779B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for identifying or authenticating an object. The method includes vibrating the object at a plurality of frequencies. The vibrations from the object are sensed at each of the plurality of frequencies using an accelerometer. A vibration profile of the object is generated using the sensed vibrations. The generated vibration profile is then compared to a stored vibration profile. It is determined if the generated vibration profile matches the stored vibration profile. A match indicates that the object has been identified or authenticated. In another embodiment, an object capable of implementing the method is provided. In another embodiment, the object may include a replaceable accessary. In this case, the initial and generated vibration profiles may be created with the replacement accessary attached to the object. A match of the generated and initial vibration profiles indicates that the replaceable accessary is authentic.