Vibratory Acetabular Cup Insertion with Force Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Total hip replacement surgeries face challenges due to inconsistent acetabular cup placement, leading to hip instability, polyethylene wear, osteolysis, impingement, and the need for revision surgery, primarily caused by unpredictable torques and uncontrolled forces during the installation process.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing vibratory energy to insert and position acetabular cups, employing pneumatic and electric motor implementations, and incorporating real-time sensing to standardize the installation process, allowing for precise alignment and orientation without manual impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual impacting tools (hammer/mallet) are used to install acetabular component, then installation can be completed, but the location and orientation become unpredictable and may differ from intended optimum position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation processVSAvoidacetabular component placement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical impacting system (hammer/mallet) with an automated impacting tool that incorporates computer-assisted navigation. The automated tool delivers controlled impacts while sensors and navigation systems monitor and adjust the acetabular component's position in real-time, eliminating the unpredictability of manual impacting while maintaining the mechanical installation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensors mounted on the impacting tool continuously monitor the position and orientation of the acetabular component during installation. This real-time feedback is fed to the computer-assisted navigation system, which automatically adjusts subsequent impacts to correct any deviations from the intended position, ensuring precise final placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If automated computer-assisted navigation tools are used to determine correct orientation, then positioning accuracy is improved, but the actual impacting force and location remain uncontrolled variables

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacetabular component orientationVSAvoidimpact control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the computer-assisted navigation system with the impacting tool itself, integrating sensors, actuators, and control electronics directly into the impacting device. This integration allows the navigation system to directly control the impacting mechanism, eliminating the disconnect between planning precision and execution control while managing complexity through unified design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by using sensors to continuously monitor position, orientation, and impact forces, then dynamically adjusting impacting parameters (force magnitude, impact location, impact frequency) based on real-time feedback. This allows the system to adapt to varying bone density and anatomical conditions while maintaining precise control over the final component placement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If large impacting forces are applied by mallet striking rod, then acetabular component is secured in place, but fine tuning becomes difficult and risk of fracturing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent fixationVSAvoidbone fracture risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses periodic, controlled impacts delivered by the automated impacting tool rather than large single-force strikes. The computer-assisted system spaces impacts appropriately and monitors bone response between impacts, allowing fine-tuning of component position while gradually securing fixation. This periodic action reduces peak stresses on the bone and allows continuous adjustment to achieve optimal positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements real-time feedback monitoring during the impacting process, where sensors detect bone density, component position, and impact forces. This feedback allows the automated tool to adjust impact parameters dynamically, reducing force when bone is fragile or position is near-optimal, and increasing force when additional stabilization is needed, thereby minimizing fracture risk while ensuring reliable fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the risk of fracturing the acetabulum, enables accurate and efficient prosthesis placement, and improves surgical outcomes by standardizing the installation process, making it feasible for less experienced surgeons to achieve results comparable to experienced ones.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor configured to detect forces at an interface between the prosthesis and the bone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Implementation Method 2

utilizing vibratory energy to insert and position acetabular cups

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibratory energy: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS11786207B2Invasive sense measurement in prosthesis installation
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 BEHZADI KAMBIZ
  • US11786207B2 patent drawing
  • US11786207B2 patent drawing
  • US11786207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for allowing any surgeon, including those surgeons who perform a fewer number of a replacement procedure as compared to a more experienced surgeon who performs a greater number of procedures, to provide an improved likelihood of a favorable outcome approaching, if not exceeding, a likelihood of a favorable outcome as performed by a very experienced surgeon with the replacement procedure. Force sensing is included to aid in quantifying installation of an implant, particularly a cup into a pelvic bone.