Vibratory Feeder Detector for Farrowing Warning Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing warning systems for animal farrowing operations struggle to accurately detect and prevent piglets from being crushed by their mother due to reliance on acoustical signals, which are inconsistent across different ages and breeds, and are compromised by the acoustics of enclosed confinement buildings.

Innovation Solution

A warning system that utilizes a vibratory detector to identify vibratory signals from feeders, coupled with a processor that analyzes these signals to determine possible and likely action events, and triggers a warning device to alert the mother without generating false positives through the use of false positive sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If acoustical sensors are used to detect feeder distress signals, then the system can detect potential crushing events, but the detection accuracy deteriorates due to inconsistent sounds across different piglet ages and breeds, and acoustical interference from confinement building structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsignal consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces acoustical sensors with vibration sensors that detect mechanical vibrations transmitted through the concrete floor. This substitution eliminates the problems of acoustical signal inconsistency and building structure interference, as vibrations travel more reliably through the solid floor medium regardless of piglet age, breed, or building acoustics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If warning devices provide frequent alerts to prevent feeder crushing, then the incidence of feeder mortality decreases, but false alarms increase which may condition the mother to ignore alerts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeder protection effectivenessVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates false positive sensors that provide feedback to verify detected events before triggering warnings. This feedback mechanism confirms that detected vibrations are genuine distress signals rather than false positives, ensuring alerts are only generated when truly necessary and preventing mother conditioning to ignore warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the incidence of feeder mortality by accurately detecting distress signals from feeders and minimizing false alarms, thereby reducing the risk of unnecessary stimulation that could condition the mother to ignore alerts.

Implementation Method 1

a vibratory detector for detecting a vibratory signal from one or more feeders

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration detection: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS12290046B2Detection, prevention, and reaction in a warning system for animal farrowing operations
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 SWINETECH INC
  • US12290046B2 patent drawing
  • US12290046B2 patent drawing
  • US12290046B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detector for detecting a signal from one or more feeders. A processor is in communication with the can be configured with an artificial intelligence module and a library of pre-recorded action events and for comparing the signal with the library of pre-recorded action events and determining a likely action event. A warning device can be in communication with the processor for providing an output in response to the likely action event. At least one false positive sensor in communication with either the processor or the warning device or both of the processor and the warning device can be used for stopping the output from the warning device upon a predetermined condition.