Vibratory Mixer Control via Dynamic Frequency Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vibratory mixers operate at limited frequency and amplitude ranges, often avoiding natural resonant frequencies to prevent wear, which restricts optimal mixing efficiency and can lead to over-mixing or damage to materials, and lack a smart method to determine optimal operating states based on dynamic energy absorption.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for controlling vibratory/oscillatory mixers that adjust input force waveforms and frequencies to achieve optimal operating points for displacement, velocity, acceleration, or jerk, using feedback from the mechanical system and material characteristics to ensure efficient energy absorption and prevent adverse effects on the materials being mixed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional vibratory mixers operate at fixed frequency and narrow amplitude limits, then the mechanism avoids high loads and wear, but mixing efficiency is restricted and optimal operating points cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism wear and loadVSAvoidmixing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic control of vibratory mixers by continuously adjusting operating frequency and amplitude based on real-time feedback from sensors measuring displacement, velocity, acceleration, and jerk. This allows the system to dynamically transition between different operating modes (avoiding resonance when necessary, achieving optimal mixing points when beneficial) rather than operating at fixed parameters, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms using sensors to monitor system response and material characteristics, then adjusts operating parameters accordingly. This closed-loop control enables the mixer to identify optimal operating points and avoid detrimental resonance conditions dynamically, allowing the system to maximize mixing efficiency while maintaining reliability through adaptive parameter adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If natural resonant frequency is avoided to prevent high loads and wear, then mechanism reliability is maintained, but optimal mixing efficiency at resonant frequency cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism wear and loadVSAvoidmixing efficiency at resonant frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating frequency based on real-time system response measurements. When resonance conditions are detected as beneficial for mixing efficiency, the system can safely operate at or near resonant frequency. When resonance causes excessive loads or wear, the system automatically adjusts away from resonance. This dynamic adaptability resolves the contradiction by allowing resonant operation only when beneficial

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes operating parameters (frequency, amplitude, waveform shape) based on measured system response and material characteristics. By continuously monitoring displacement, velocity, acceleration, and jerk, the system identifies optimal parameter combinations that achieve efficient mixing at resonant frequency without causing detrimental loads, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If maximum displacement, velocity, acceleration, or jerk amplitude is used to maximize mixing efficiency, then productivity is improved, but material damage or over-mixing may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial damage or over-mixing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from sensors measuring displacement, velocity, acceleration, and jerk to monitor material response in real-time. When optimal mixing efficiency is achieved without causing material damage, the system maintains those parameters. When signs of material damage or over-mixing are detected, the system automatically adjusts parameters to reduce intensity. This feedback control resolves the contradiction by enabling high-intensity mixing only when safe

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters based on real-time material response characteristics. By continuously monitoring system response and material behavior, the system can transition between different intensity levels to maximize mixing efficiency while preventing material damage. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to operate at maximum safe intensity rather than fixed conservative limits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system optimizes mixing efficiency by adjusting operating conditions to maximize energy absorption while preventing over-mixing or material damage, ensuring safe and effective mixing processes by dynamically adjusting to changing material properties and energy absorption.

Implementation Method 1

operating the actuator at a first oscillatory input force waveform having a first frequency and a first input force amplitude to produce a first associated oscillatory response waveform within a primary mode of resonance in the mechanical system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

measuring a first phase angle between the first oscillatory input force waveform and the first associated oscillatory response waveform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase angle measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS10456760B2Control of vibratory/oscillatory mixers
Publication Date: 2019.10.29 RESODYN CORP
  • US10456760B2 patent drawing
  • US10456760B2 patent drawing
  • US10456760B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for controlling a mixing system at a peak energy efficiency point, maximum response point or reduced sound generation point based on displacement, velocity, acceleration or jerk operating conditions.