Vibro-acoustic Analysis for Modal Overlap Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional structural vibration analysis methods, such as modal analysis, are inadequate for complex systems with overlapping natural modes and cannot perform in situ or non-invasive analysis, failing to account for sound radiation and requiring disassembly of machines for testing.

Innovation Solution

A vibro-acoustic analysis method that uses non-invasive measurements of surface velocities and sound pressures to decompose vibration responses into orthogonal VA modes, allowing for in situ analysis and identification of sound and vibration contributors, employing algorithms and tools like singular value decomposition to process data and calculate sound radiation efficiencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional modal analysis is used to identify natural frequencies and modes, then structural vibration can be analyzed, but it cannot handle modal overlapping cases where many natural modes occur at the same frequency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration analysis accuracyVSAvoidcapability to handle modal overlapping
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical vibration analysis methods with an acoustic field-based approach. By measuring acoustic pressure fields radiated by the structure and using acoustic radiation mode analysis, the system can distinguish between overlapping structural modes through their unique acoustic radiation patterns, even when multiple modes share the same frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the acoustic field as an intermediary between the structure and measurement instruments. Instead of directly measuring structural vibration at multiple points (which fails under modal overlapping), the system measures the acoustic pressure field in the surrounding medium, which carries information about all structural modes including overlapping ones through their radiation characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If traditional modal analysis is performed on a running machine, then in situ analysis is required, but there is no way to measure the excitation forces that occur inside the cylinders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvein situ analysis capabilityVSAvoidexcitation force measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional measurement approach. Instead of measuring excitation forces and predicting vibrations (which requires internal force measurement), the system measures the acoustic radiation field produced by the structure and uses inverse analysis to identify the vibration modes and their contributions to sound radiation, eliminating the need for direct excitation force measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical force measurement with acoustic field measurement. By measuring the acoustic pressure field outside the machine, the system can infer information about internal vibrations and mode contributions without needing to access or measure the internal excitation forces that are impossible to obtain in situ.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If traditional modal analysis is used, then structural vibration can be studied, but it has nothing to do with sound radiation into the surrounding medium

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural vibration measurementVSAvoidsound radiation analysis capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges structural vibration analysis with sound radiation analysis into a unified framework. By analyzing the acoustic radiation modes that directly link structural vibrations to sound radiation, the system simultaneously identifies both the vibration characteristics and their contribution to acoustic emissions, enabling targeted noise control based on vibration-sound coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cost-effective noise and vibration abatement by identifying key contributors to sound and structural vibrations, allowing for design modifications without disassembling machines, providing a comprehensive understanding of sound generation mechanisms and improving machine performance.

Implementation Method 1

sound pressure measured using an array of microphones stationed at very close range to a machine to capture the near-field effects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound pressure measurement: Sound

Implementation Method 2

hardware such as a scanning laser vibrometer to acquire the normal surface velocity responses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser vibrometry: Laser Doppler Velocimetry

Data Source

PatentUS8893550B2Non-invasive vibro-acoustic analysis
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 WAYNE STATE UNIV
  • US8893550B2 patent drawing
  • US8893550B2 patent drawing
  • US8893550B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system provides an in situ or non-invasive vibro-acoustic (VA) analysis of an arbitrary complex vibrating structure. The noise diagnostic system includes a plurality of first transducers for measuring acoustic pressure in a sound field near a noise source. At least one second transducer measures normal surface velocity on the noise source. A computer acquires acoustic pressure data from the plurality of first transducers and normal surface velocity data from the at least one second transducer. The computer generates a transfer matrix representing a correlation between normal surface velocity on the noise source and the acoustic pressure in the sound field.