Video Action Detection via Bidirectional Feedback Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video processing technologies are inefficient for action detection in videos, often requiring extensive manual searching and may inaccurately classify or localize actions, leading to missed relevant scenes or inappropriate content being played in inappropriate settings.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using machine learning with a bidirectional feedback mechanism between action type and time extent prediction, refining classifications and localizations through attention mechanisms to improve accuracy and precision in action detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional video processing methods are used for action detection, then manual searching is required, but this consumes excessive user time and may miss relevant scenes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction detection efficiencyVSAvoiduser searching time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The video processing system performs automatic action detection, classification, and localization without requiring user intervention. The machine learning models autonomously analyze video content, identify actions, and generate temporal boundaries, enabling the system to serve itself rather than relying on manual user searching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical searching with automated machine learning-based action detection. Instead of users manually watching and searching through video content, computer vision algorithms and neural networks automatically detect and classify actions, substituting human manual effort with automated computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If simple action classification is performed, then processing is faster, but classification accuracy and localization precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the action detection task into distinct functional modules: a classification module for identifying action types and a localization module for determining temporal boundaries. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in its specific function, improving overall accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an attention mechanism as an intermediary between the classification and localization modules. This attention mechanism refines the predictions by focusing on relevant temporal regions and adjusting boundaries based on classification confidence, thereby improving localization precision without requiring a complete redesign of the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If unrefined action predictions are output, then processing is faster, but errors in classification and localization increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action classification before localization, and then refines both predictions using an attention mechanism. This preliminary classification provides a foundation for subsequent localization and refinement steps, ensuring that accurate predictions are established early in the processing pipeline before final output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the classification results inform the localization process, and the localization results are refined based on classification confidence. The attention mechanism uses feedback from both modules to adjust temporal boundaries and improve prediction accuracy, creating a closed-loop system that continuously refines its outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240303508A1Detecting actions in video using machine learning and based on bidirectional feedback between predicted type and predicted extent
Publication Date: 2024.09.12 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240303508A1 patent drawing
  • US20240303508A1 patent drawing
  • US20240303508A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques of video processing for action detection using machine learning. An action depicted in a video is identified. A type of the action is predicted based on a classification module of one or more machine learning models. A video clip depicting the action is predicted in the video. To that end, a starting point and an ending point of the video clip in the video are determined. The video clip is predicted based on a localization module of the one or more machine learning models. A refinement is performed that includes refining the type of the action based on the video clip or refining the video clip based on the type of the action. An indication of the refined type or of the refined video clip is output.