Video Analysis System for Privacy-Preserving Surveillance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video surveillance systems fail to balance data protection and privacy concerns, leading to a negative public perception and reduced effectiveness in crime investigation due to the ability to identify individuals, which hampers the spread of these systems and their utility in securing environments.

Innovation Solution

A method for video analysis that processes digital video signals to distinguish and obscure foreground regions, particularly human figures, while maintaining the ability to recognize movements and actions without revealing identities, allowing for immediate response to incidents without violating anonymity, and enabling the use of video as evidence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If video surveillance systems use clear image processing to enable identification of individuals, then crime investigation effectiveness is improved, but privacy protection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidprivacy violation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the video processing into distinct stages: initial clear capture for evidence collection, followed by separation of identification data from monitoring data. The system segments the functionality so that identification features are extracted and stored separately from the video footage, allowing crime investigation while protecting privacy during public display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts identification-relevant features (such as facial characteristics, gait patterns, or other biometric data) from the video content and separates them from the actual video images. This extraction allows the system to maintain clear video records for investigative purposes while displaying only anonymized versions to the public, thus resolving the contradiction between identification accuracy and privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If video surveillance systems anonymize individuals to protect privacy, then privacy protection is improved, but crime investigation effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidcrime investigation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism in the form of automated identification systems that can analyze anonymized video content. These intermediaries (AI algorithms, pattern recognition systems) can extract meaningful information about suspicious activities, movements, and behaviors from anonymized footage, maintaining crime investigation capability without requiring public access to identifiable images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of video content at different processing stages. Full-resolution, identifiable copies are stored securely for investigative purposes, while anonymized copies are used for public display and general monitoring. This copying strategy allows both privacy protection and crime investigation effectiveness to be maintained simultaneously through differentiated access to different versions of the same data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If video surveillance systems store detailed records for crime investigation, then investigation effectiveness is improved, but data protection risks deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence qualityVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing different security and access control measures for different portions of the video data. High-security access controls, encryption, and restricted access are applied to the original identifiable video content, while anonymized versions with lower security requirements are available for general use. This differentiated approach maintains evidence quality while reducing overall data protection risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2462557B2Method for video analysis
Publication Date: 2023.03.22 KIWISECURITY SOFTWARE
  • EP2462557B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2462557B2 patent drawingFigure 2~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for video analysis, in particular for video monitoring, wherein a digital input video signal is processed in real time, wherein the input video signal comprises at least one first input image and a second input image (11), which follows the first input image at least indirectly, wherein the input images (11) each have a specifiable number of pixels, wherein a background image (12) is determined from the at least one first input image and the second input image (11), and at least one foreground area (18) is determined, the location of which changes relative to the background image (12) in the second input image (11), wherein in order to secure the privacy and/or private sphere of video-monitored persons, the foreground area (18) is made unrecognizable, an output image (14) is formed from the background image (12) or the second input image (11) and the foreground area (18') made unrecognizable, an output video signal is formed from output images (14) that follow each other at least indirectly, and the output images (14) and/or the output video signal are output and/or stored.