Multi-modal Video Annotation Timeline with Color-coded Markers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video annotation tools lack multimodal capabilities, fine-grained access control, navigational control, and rich annotation positioning, making them inadequate for collaborative work on creative temporal projects like dance, where multiple stakeholders need to annotate videos with various forms of input such as text, audio, and video.

Innovation Solution

A method for displaying a video annotation interface that allows users to select and annotate videos with multiple modalities (text, audio, video) using a timeline-based interface, enabling users to add comments, define segments, and navigate through annotations, with features like color coding and playback speed control, facilitating collaborative video annotation across different user accounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If video annotation tools support only single modality (mostly text), then the tool complexity remains low, but the annotation capability and versatility are insufficient for collaborative work on creative temporal projects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation capabilityVSAvoidtool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The annotation system is designed to support multiple modalities (text, audio, video, digital ink) within a single unified platform, allowing users to annotate videos with various forms of input. The system provides a common interface that handles different annotation types consistently, enabling versatile collaborative work on creative temporal projects like dance without requiring separate specialized tools for each modality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the system provides comprehensive navigational control and fine-grained access, then the ease of operation improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigational controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The video timeline is divided into discrete segments that can be independently annotated and navigated. The system provides fine-grained control through segment-based navigation, allowing users to jump to specific annotated portions of the video. This segmentation approach enables comprehensive navigational control while maintaining operational simplicity through a structured, modular interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to the annotation interface through timeline-based navigation. Annotations are positioned along the video timeline, and users can navigate by selecting specific time points or segments. This dimensional approach to navigation provides fine-grained control over video playback and annotation access without requiring complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of information

If the system supports rich annotation positioning and user-based color coding, then the information organization improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation organizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements user-based color coding where each user's annotations are displayed with their assigned color. This visual distinction allows multiple users to contribute annotations to the same video while maintaining clear attribution and organization. The color coding system provides rich information organization through visual differentiation without requiring complex metadata management or additional interface elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

4Productivity

If the system enables comprehensive collaborative annotation with multiple modalities, then the productivity improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaborative annotation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple annotation modalities (text, audio, video, digital ink) and multiple user contributions into a single unified annotation layer. This consolidation allows collaborative work on creative temporal projects where different stakeholders can annotate the same video content using their preferred modality, with all annotations integrated and synchronized to the video timeline. The unified approach improves collaborative productivity by eliminating the need for separate annotation systems for each modality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9354763B2Multi-modal collaborative web-based video annotation system
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 THE UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
  • US9354763B2 patent drawing
  • US9354763B2 patent drawing
  • US9354763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A video annotation interface includes a video pane configured to display a video, a video timeline bar including a video play-head indicating a current point of the video which is being played, a segment timeline bar including initial and final handles configured to define a segment of the video for playing, and a plurality of color-coded comment markers displayed in connection with the video timeline bar. Each of the comment markers is associated with a frame or segment of the video and corresponds to one or more annotations for that frame or segment made by one of a plurality of users. Each of the users can make annotations and view annotations made by other users. The annotations can include annotations corresponding to a plurality of modalities, including text, drawing, video, and audio modalities.