Video Annotation Timeline Synchronization for Real-Time Collaboration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video annotation systems require manual human intervention for importing metadata into non-linear editing environments, limiting real-time updates and efficiency in annotating and searching video frames.

Innovation Solution

A method where time-stamped metadata or commentary is automatically displayed on a timeline in a second computing device, allowing real-time updates and collaboration, with features like controlled vocabulary, automatic generation of metadata from sensors, and scalable collaboration, enabling editors to work with annotated video without manual action.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual human intervention is used for importing metadata into non-linear editing environments, then data accuracy can be ensured through human review, but real-time updates and operational efficiency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidreal-time update speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service through real-time synchronization between annotation devices and non-linear editing environments. Metadata annotations are automatically pushed to the NLE without requiring manual import actions, while maintaining data integrity through structured data transmission protocols and automated validation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback loops where annotations made on one device are immediately reflected across all connected devices and the NLE environment. This continuous feedback mechanism ensures data accuracy through automated consistency checking while maintaining real-time update capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If manual action is required to import metadata annotations, then system complexity can be reduced, but ease of operation and workflow efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated self-service by establishing persistent connections between annotation devices and NLE environments. Metadata is automatically synchronized and imported without requiring users to manually initiate transfer operations, significantly improving workflow efficiency while the underlying automated mechanisms manage system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares metadata for automatic import by pre-structuring data in standardized formats and establishing synchronization protocols in advance. This preliminary preparation enables seamless automatic import operations without requiring complex real-time processing decisions during workflow execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If real-time automatic display of metadata is implemented, then productivity and collaboration efficiency are improved, but device complexity and data synchronization requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation speedVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time feedback mechanisms where each annotation device continuously reports metadata changes to a central synchronization system, which then distributes updates to all connected NLE environments. This feedback loop enables real-time automatic display while the centralized coordination manages synchronization complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary synchronization layer that mediates between multiple annotation devices and NLE environments. This intermediary handles data normalization, conflict resolution, and distribution, enabling real-time automatic display across multiple devices while isolating complexity within the intermediary component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If multiple loggers or annotators collaborate on the same video, then annotation coverage and quality are improved, but coordination complexity and potential conflicts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation qualityVSAvoidcollaboration coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments annotation responsibilities by allowing multiple loggers to work on different time ranges, video tracks, or metadata types simultaneously. This segmentation reduces coordination conflicts while maintaining comprehensive annotation coverage and quality through the combined efforts of multiple annotators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback mechanisms that notify annotators of concurrent editing activities and potential conflicts. This feedback enables annotators to coordinate their work effectively, maintaining high annotation quality through collaborative awareness while the system manages coordination complexity through automated conflict detection and resolution protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11589137B2Method for collaborative comments or metadata annotation of video
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 IPV
  • US11589137B2 patent drawing
  • US11589137B2 patent drawing
  • US11589137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A logger or annotator views video in a window or user interface (UI) of a computing device and enters time-stamped metadata or commentary; that metadata or commentary is then automatically displayed on a timeline or other time-based index in a different window or user interface of a second computing device used by a viewer or editor of that video. The metadata or commentary is represented by a marker or icon appearing on a timeline displayed in the window or user interface of a second computing device, and the metadata or commentary is shown when the viewer or editor selects that marker or icon.