Video Authentication Using Cryptographic Frame Signatures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing quality of artificial intelligence-generated videos and deep fakes makes it difficult to distinguish authentic from fake digital video evidence, undermining the reliability of digital video as evidence.

Innovation Solution

Implementing cryptographic functions, such as hash functions, to generate unique identifiers or digital signatures for individual video frames and clips during recording, which are verified during playback to ensure authenticity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pixel-level examination is used to identify fake video clues, then low-quality fake videos can be detected, but detection effectiveness deteriorates as fake video quality improves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoidauthentication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by embedding cryptographic signatures and authentication data during the video recording and encoding process itself, rather than attempting to detect fakes after creation. This proactive approach ensures authenticity is built into the video from the source, making detection independent of fake video quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cryptographic hash functions and digital signatures as intermediary mechanisms between the video content and authentication verification. These mathematical intermediaries provide a reliable bridge for verifying authenticity without relying on visual or pixel-level analysis of the video content itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If digital signatures are implemented during recording, then video authenticity can be validated, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the authentication function into a separate cryptographic processing layer that operates independently from the main video recording and playback systems. By separating the signature generation and verification processes from core video operations, the system adds authentication capability without significantly complicating the primary video handling workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter space by transitioning from visual/pixel-based authentication parameters to cryptographic parameter spaces (hash values, digital signatures). This parameter transformation simplifies the authentication logic to mathematical operations that are computationally efficient and can be implemented with standard cryptographic libraries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250392469A1Systems and Methods for Video Authentication
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 REKOR LABS LLC
  • US20250392469A1 patent drawing
  • US20250392469A1 patent drawing
  • US20250392469A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An image data validation system includes an image source that captures an image of an object and generates, from the captured image, image data and associated metadata. The metadata stores a first unique identifier generated by applying a cryptographic function to the image data. The system also includes an image recipient that receive the image data and the metadata from the image source and generates a second unique identifier from the image data by applying the cryptographic function to the image data. The recipient validates the image data as having not been altered by comparing the first unique identifier to the second unique identifier.