Video Block Prediction Fusion for Cross-Component Coding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video coding technologies, such as MPEG-2, MPEG-4, ITU-T.263, ITU-T.264/MPEG-4 AVC, ITU-T.265 HEVC, and VVC, face challenges in improving coding efficiency and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a cross-component prediction (CCP) model that fuses multiple predictions for video blocks, using a first CCP candidate and a second prediction to enhance coding efficiency and effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional video coding technologies (MPEG-2, MPEG-4, AVC, HEVC, VVC) are used, then video compression is achieved, but coding efficiency and effectiveness are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding efficiencyVSAvoidcoding effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple prediction methods by fusing the first prediction (from first CCP candidate) and the second prediction (from second CCP candidate) to generate a fused prediction for the current video block. This combination of multiple prediction sources improves both coding efficiency and effectiveness by leveraging complementary information from different prediction candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite prediction signal by combining multiple prediction candidates (first CCP candidate and second CCP candidate) into a fused prediction. This composite approach integrates strengths from different prediction sources, achieving superior coding performance compared to single prediction methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a single prediction method is used for video blocks, then processing is simple, but coding effectiveness is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding effectivenessVSAvoidprediction processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial fusion by selectively fusing predictions only for specific video blocks where multiple CCP candidates are available and beneficial. This approach improves coding effectiveness without unnecessarily increasing complexity for all blocks, achieving a balanced solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The fused prediction acts as an intermediary that combines information from multiple CCP candidates. This intermediate fused prediction then serves as the basis for encoding the current video block, simplifying the overall process while improving effectiveness compared to evaluating multiple separate predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260032235A1Method, apparatus, and medium for video processing
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 BYTEDANCE INC
  • US20260032235A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032235A1 patent drawing
  • US20260032235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a solution for video processing. A method for video processing is proposed. In the method, for a conversion between a current video block of a video and a bitstream of the video, a first prediction of the current video block is determined based on a first cross component prediction (CCP) candidate in a CCP candidate list for the current video block. A fused prediction is determined based on the first prediction and a second prediction of the current video block. The conversion is performed based on the fused prediction.