Video Conference System Dynamic Display Adaptation for Disability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Video conferencing systems often fail to accommodate participants with disabilities, as they rely on fixed display rules that do not account for varying needs such as hearing, vision, or speech impairments, potentially hindering their ability to fully participate.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes participant characteristics, such as voice, gestures, and facial expressions to dynamically adjust video conference settings, including display size and format, to better facilitate participation for individuals with disabilities, such as enlarging the active speaker's image for the partially blind or providing lip reading assistance for the hard of hearing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed display rules are used for video conferencing, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but it cannot accommodate participants with disabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of participants with disabilitiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The video conference system dynamically adjusts display parameters such as window size, position, and visibility based on real-time detection of participant disabilities. The system transitions from static fixed rules to dynamic adaptive configuration, modifying the display layout according to detected needs of participants with hearing, vision, or speech impairments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects participant disabilities through analysis of video feeds and audio characteristics, then self-configures the display settings without requiring manual input from participants. The system serves itself by identifying needs and implementing accommodations autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If automatic disability detection and dynamic configuration is implemented, then participation of individuals with disabilities is enhanced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of participation for disabled individualsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual configuration operations with automated detection and adjustment mechanisms. Instead of requiring participants to manually adjust settings, the system uses computer vision and audio analysis to automatically detect disabilities and configure optimal display parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple display parameters simultaneously including window size, position, visibility, and layout configuration based on detected disability types. Parameters such as the size of active speaker windows and positioning of participant video feeds are dynamically adjusted to accommodate specific needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple active speakers are displayed for hard of hearing participants, then lip reading capability is improved, but the display layout complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelip reading capabilityVSAvoiddisplay layout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The display is segmented into functional zones with different purposes: enlarged active speaker windows for lip reading, smaller background participant windows, and text caption areas. The segmentation allows optimization of specific display regions for particular functions while maintaining overall system coherence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Illumination intensity

If the active speaker image is enlarged for partially blind participants, then visibility is improved, but other participants may be less visible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual visibility for partially blind participantsVSAvoidvisibility of other participants
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses spatial arrangement in multiple display dimensions to resolve the visibility conflict. Enlarged active speaker windows are positioned in primary viewing areas while smaller participant windows are arranged in background or peripheral areas, ensuring both prominence of active speakers and visibility of other participants through strategic spatial distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11132535B2Automatic video conference configuration to mitigate a disability
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 AVAYA INC
  • US11132535B2 patent drawing
  • US11132535B2 patent drawing
  • US11132535B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Video conferences are a common occurrence in many business, academic, and other settings. Systems and methods provided herein enable a participant of a video conference, who has an impairment or disability, such as to hearing, speech, or vision, to have that impairment or disability mitigated by automatically detecting and implementing mitigating actions to the participants local device and/or the devices of the remote participants.