Video Decoder Overlay Legibility HDR Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video systems face challenges in dynamically adapting video signals to match the characteristics of displays with varying dynamic ranges, leading to issues such as legibility problems with bright overlays, halo effects, and inconsistent image quality when overlaying graphics on HDR video.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for decoding HDR video signals that include reading least significant bits to determine merging properties of pixels, allowing for adaptive dynamic range adjustment based on the contribution of overlay signals, enabling separate adaptation of video and overlay components to optimize image rendering on displays with different dynamic ranges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If dynamic range adaptation is applied to the entire merged video signal, then HDR image quality is improved, but overlay graphics become illegible or exhibit halo effects

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHDR image qualityVSAvoidoverlay graphics legibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The video signal is segmented into different types (video content vs. overlay graphics) based on metadata identifiers. This allows the dynamic range adaptation to be selectively applied only to video content segments while preserving overlay graphics segments in their original form, thereby improving HDR image quality without compromising overlay legibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing qualities are applied to different parts of the signal based on their type. Video content receives full dynamic range adaptation processing to enhance HDR quality, while overlay graphics receive no or minimal processing to maintain their original appearance and legibility. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between improving overall image quality and preserving specific graphic elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If dynamic range adaptation is not applied, then overlay graphics remain legible, but HDR image quality and contrast are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverlay graphics legibilityVSAvoidHDR image quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The signal is divided into processable segments with identified types through metadata. This segmentation enables the system to apply adaptive processing only where needed (video content) while leaving other segments (overlays) untouched, thus achieving HDR quality improvement without sacrificing overlay legibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing approach dynamically changes based on the signal segment type. The system transitions from a static all-or-nothing processing approach to a dynamic selective processing approach, where the level of dynamic range adaptation applied depends on whether the current segment is video content or overlay graphics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If separate processing of video and overlay components is implemented, then image rendering quality is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage rendering qualityVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Metadata identifying the type of each signal segment is prepared in advance during signal generation or transmission. This preliminary tagging of video content versus overlay graphics eliminates the need for complex real-time analysis and classification, simplifying the processing system while enabling high-quality selective rendering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The signal segments essentially identify themselves through embedded metadata tags. The processing system does not need to actively analyze or classify segments; instead, the segments provide their own classification information, reducing the computational burden and complexity of the processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10567826B2Method for encoding, video processor, method for decoding, video decoder
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US10567826B2 patent drawing
  • US10567826B2 patent drawing
  • US10567826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a video processing system, such as e.g. a set top box or a BD player wherein in a merger video can be merged with one or more overlays a video/overlay pixel indication (A) is encoded in one or more of the least significant bits of one or more of the color components in the video signal. The video signal is transmitted over the interface between VPS and display. The display subject the image to an adaptation. This adaptation is performed dependent on the video/overlay pixel indication (A).