Video Decoder Power-State Control for Lower Battery Drain
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Battery-powered devices, such as mobile electronic devices with video decoding capabilities, face limitations in power consumption due to limited energy capacity, leading to short run-times and increased energy consumption from functional integration, with existing power conservation techniques being insufficiently proactive.
Innovation Solution
A power management controller varies the power consumption of video decoder operational portions based on encoding description data from input streams, using application profile data to selectively adjust clock frequencies and power supply voltages of processor components, thereby minimizing power usage without operator intervention.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If video decoding operations are performed in battery-powered devices, then video functionality is provided, but power consumption increases and battery runtime decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic power management by making the video decoder's operational state adjustable based on real-time conditions. The system transitions between active decoding mode and low-power modes (such as hardware acceleration mode or software decoding mode) depending on battery status, video complexity, and thermal conditions, thereby optimizing the balance between video performance and power consumption
Solution Approach 2:
The system changes operational parameters of the video decoder including clock frequency, voltage levels, and decoding algorithm selection based on input video characteristics and battery state. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system reduces power consumption during video decoding while maintaining acceptable video quality and playback performance
2Adaptability or versatility
If multiple functions are integrated into battery-powered devices, then device functionality increases, but energy consumption increases and runtime decreases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the video processing functionality into separate hardware and software components. The hardware video decoder handles standard video decoding tasks, while a software fallback handles specialized or complex decoding scenarios. This segmentation allows the system to use the more power-efficient hardware path for routine operations while maintaining full functionality through software when needed
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements self-service power management where the video decoder automatically monitors its own power consumption, thermal state, and performance requirements to select appropriate operational modes without external intervention. The system autonomously transitions between high-performance and low-power states based on real-time conditions, optimizing battery runtime while maintaining required functionality
3Loss of energy
If reactive power conservation techniques are used, then some power is saved, but significant battery power is consumed before triggering occurs
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements preliminary power conservation measures by proactively reducing the video decoder's power consumption before battery depletion occurs. The system continuously monitors battery status and preemptively transitions to low-power modes when battery level drops below thresholds, preventing the need for aggressive power saving measures later when battery capacity is critically low
Data Source
AI summary
A video decoder (10) with reduced power consumption includes a power management controller (45) that is operative to select one of a plurality of different power consumption states for a video decoder (10), and, in response to the determination, vary power consumption of at least one operational portion of the video decoder (10). In addition, in one example, a method (200) for reducing power consumption for a video decoder (10) includes determining input stream encoding description data (34) to select one of a plurality of different power consumption states for a video decoder (10) and, in response to the determination, varying power consumption of at least one operational portion of the video decoder (10).


