Video Processing With Stepwise Editing Prompts for User Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video editing applications using the 'Try this template' feature lack user participation and flexibility, as they automatically apply editing operations from a template without allowing users to understand or adjust the specific editing sequence.

Innovation Solution

A video processing method that obtains a reference editing operation sequence from a user, providing step-by-step operation prompts on an editing interface to guide the user in performing the editing operations on a target video, allowing for undo and end operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system automatically applies all editing operations from a template without user intervention, then the editing process is fast and simple, but the user cannot understand or adjust the specific editing sequence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting speedVSAvoiduser understanding of editing sequence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the template editing operations into individual steps and presents them sequentially to the user. Instead of applying all operations at once, the system divides the editing process into discrete, manageable units that can be reviewed and controlled step-by-step, allowing users to understand each operation while maintaining efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of the template video to extract and organize the editing operation sequence before presenting it to the user. This preliminary processing prepares the editing steps in advance, so when the user reviews the operations, they are already structured and ready for efficient application, reducing the time needed for user review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If the system provides step-by-step operation prompts for each editing operation, then the user can understand and adjust the editing sequence, but the editing process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser understanding of editing sequenceVSAvoidediting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that provide the user with information about the current editing step, its parameters, and its effect on the video. This feedback allows users to make informed decisions about whether to apply, modify, or skip operations without requiring extensive analysis of each step, thus reducing the time burden while maintaining user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the editing process dynamic by allowing users to adjust the level of detail in operation prompts based on their needs. Users can choose to review detailed step-by-step instructions or switch to a more condensed view, enabling flexible time investment while maintaining understanding of the editing sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system allows users to selectively apply only specific editing operations from a template, then the user has flexibility and control, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser flexibility in editingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing users to make selective decisions about individual editing operations while maintaining the overall template structure. Each editing operation can be independently enabled or disabled, modified, or adjusted without affecting the entire editing pipeline, providing fine-grained control without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If the system presents all editing operations at once, then the interface is simple, but the user cannot easily identify which operation to perform next

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface simplicityVSAvoidoperation sequence clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the presentation of editing operations to show them sequentially rather than all at once. The interface displays one operation at a time or in small batches, with clear indicators of the current step and its position in the overall sequence. This segmentation maintains interface simplicity while dramatically improving operation sequence clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12346549B2Video processing method and apparatus, device, and medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.01 BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECH CO LTD
  • US12346549B2 patent drawing
  • US12346549B2 patent drawing
  • US12346549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to a video processing method and apparatus, a device, and a medium. The method includes: obtaining a reference editing operation sequence specified by a user, where the reference editing operation sequence includes at least one reference editing operation arranged in a sequential order of operations; and providing operation prompts according to the sequential order of the reference editing operations, to direct the user to perform the reference editing operations on a target video step by step, where each reference editing operation in the reference editing operation sequence has a corresponding operation prompt.