Video Encoder Tool Efficiency Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video coding algorithms struggle to balance complexity and performance, particularly in consumer electronics devices with limited resources, leading to inefficiencies in data transmission and processing.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining the efficiency value of video encoding tools based on encoding performance and computational complexity, allowing for adaptive configuration of video encoders to select the most efficient tools for a given video sequence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If advanced video encoding tools are activated to improve compression efficiency, then bandwidth saving and video quality are improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic activation of video encoding tools based on real-time analysis of video content characteristics and device capabilities. The system adjusts which encoding tools are activated during encoding operations, transitioning from static configuration to dynamic adaptation. This resolves the contradiction by enabling high compression efficiency when needed while reducing computational complexity when device resources are limited.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter state of encoding tools from fixed/always-active to conditionally-active based on multiple parameters including video sequence complexity, device computational resources, and power availability. By modifying the activation state parameter dynamically, the system achieves optimal balance between compression efficiency and computational complexity for different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If multiple video encoding tools are activated to achieve 50% bandwidth saving, then data transmission rate is reduced, but processing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that monitor encoding performance, device resource usage, and power consumption in real-time. Based on this feedback, the system dynamically adjusts the activation state of encoding tools to maintain optimal bandwidth savings while preventing excessive processing time and energy consumption. The feedback loop enables continuous optimization of the trade-off between transmission efficiency and processing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial activation of encoding tools rather than activating all available tools simultaneously. Based on video content analysis, the system selectively activates only the necessary subset of encoding tools required to achieve target compression ratios, avoiding the excessive processing time and energy consumption that would result from activating all tools regardless of need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If high-resolution and high-frame-rate video encoding is implemented to meet market demands, then video quality is improved, but computational complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo qualityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the video encoding process into multiple independent tool modules that can be selectively activated. For high-resolution and high-frame-rate video, the system identifies and activates only the specific encoding tools necessary to maintain quality requirements, rather than applying all encoding operations uniformly. This segmentation enables quality preservation while reducing unnecessary power consumption from redundant processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality optimization by analyzing different regions and temporal segments of video content separately. Encoding tools are activated selectively for specific video segments that require enhanced processing to maintain quality, while other segments use simpler encoding paths. This local approach preserves video quality where needed while reducing overall power consumption across the entire video sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12244814B2Method for processing a video sequence and apparatus for implementing the same
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 ATEME
  • US12244814B2 patent drawing
  • US12244814B2 patent drawing
  • US12244814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of processing a video sequence is proposed, which comprises, for a video encoding tool of a set of video encoding tools configured for encoding the video sequence comprised in a video encoder, determining an efficiency value based on an encoding performance value and an encoding computational complexity value of the video encoding tool for encoding the video sequence, and determining, based on the efficiency value of the video encoding tool, whether to configure the video encoder to use the video encoding tool for the encoding of the video sequence.