Video Encoding with LCU Partitioning and Delta QP Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video coding standards, such as H.264/AVC, face challenges with rate control and visual quality when using larger block sizes due to reduced granularity in quantization parameter (QP) adjustment, which affects coding efficiency and visual quality performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing block-based video coding with larger block sizes (e.g., LCUs) that allow for multiple quantization parameters per block, partitioning LCUs into coding units (CUs) with varying sizes, and signaling delta QPs to maintain spatial granularity and improve rate control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If larger block sizes (LCUs) are used in video coding, then coding efficiency is improved, but rate control precision and visual quality deteriorate due to reduced quantization parameter adjustment granularity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoding efficiencyVSAvoidrate control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a large LCU (e.g., 64×64 pixels) into multiple smaller coding units (CUs) of varying sizes (e.g., 32×32, 16×16, 8×8 pixels). Each CU can have its own quantization parameter, enabling fine-grained rate control while maintaining the efficiency benefits of large block processing. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by allowing both large-block coding efficiency and small-block rate control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quantization parameters to different coding units within the same LCU based on local image characteristics. Regions with high visual importance or complex content receive finer quantization (smaller QP), while less important regions use coarser quantization (larger QP). This local differentiation maintains visual quality where needed while achieving overall rate control, resolving the contradiction between coding efficiency and rate control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of substance

If larger block sizes are used, then compression ratio is improved, but visual quality performance deteriorates due to reduced quantization granularity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression ratioVSAvoidvisual quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting LCUs into multiple CUs with different sizes and applying different QP values, the patent enables selective preservation of visual detail in important regions while achieving higher overall compression. This resolves the contradiction by allowing high compression ratio globally while maintaining visual quality locally where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different quantization strengths to different regions based on their visual importance. Critical regions (e.g., edges, textures, motion areas) use finer quantization to preserve visual quality, while less critical regions use coarser quantization to maximize compression. This local quality approach resolves the contradiction between compression ratio and visual quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If multiple quantization parameters per block are implemented, then rate control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate control precisionVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments LCUs into CUs and applies different QP values, which does increase complexity but manages it through systematic rules for CU partitioning and QP derivation. The segmentation enables precise rate control while keeping the increased complexity manageable through structured approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent derives QP values for different CUs by modifying a base QP value through systematic parameter changes based on CU size, position, and image characteristics. This approach to parameter management achieves precise rate control while avoiding the need for completely independent QP optimization for each CU, thereby managing encoding complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If delta QP signaling is implemented for each coding unit, then spatial granularity is maintained, but bit rate overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial granularityVSAvoidbit rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent signals delta QP values for different CUs to achieve local quality differentiation and maintain spatial granularity in rate control. By using delta encoding (difference from a reference QP), the patent reduces the bit rate overhead compared to signaling absolute QP values for each CU, while still maintaining the ability to apply different quantization parameters locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250392721A1Video encoding and distribution methods
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20250392721A1 patent drawing
  • US20250392721A1 patent drawing
  • US20250392721A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided that includes receiving a coded largest coding unit in a video decoder, wherein the coded largest coding unit includes a coded coding unit structure and a plurality of coded quantization parameters, and decoding the coded largest coding unit based on the coded coding unit structure and the plurality of coded quantization parameters.