Video Transmission Error Validation Using Regional Frame Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video transmission systems struggle to efficiently detect and identify the source of errors in audio and video data during virtual meetings, consuming significant computing resources and failing to pinpoint errors accurately, which affects user experience and system efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method where a client device extracts error sampling data from distinct regions of an image frame before encoding, transmitting this data along with encoded image data, allowing a receiving device to compare characteristics and detect errors with minimal resource consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional error detection methods are used in video transmission systems, then errors can be detected, but computing resource consumption is significant and error source identification is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the video frame into multiple distinct regions and extracts error sampling data from each region separately. This segmentation allows the system to detect errors in specific regions without processing the entire frame, significantly reducing computing resource consumption while maintaining error detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential error sampling data from specific regions of the video frame, rather than processing the complete frame data. This extraction approach focuses computational resources on critical areas, reducing overall computing resource consumption while preserving the ability to detect and identify error sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive error detection is performed across the entire video stream, then error detection accuracy is improved, but system latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the video frame into distinct regions and selecting specific regions for error sampling, the system achieves accurate error detection in critical areas without the need to process the entire video stream. This selective approach reduces processing time and system latency while maintaining detection accuracy in the sampled regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing error detection only on selected regions rather than the complete video frame. This partial processing approach reduces the overall processing time and latency while still providing sufficient error detection accuracy for the sampled regions, which are representative of the entire video stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If error sampling is performed on multiple regions of image frames, then error source identification is improved, but data transmission volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror source identificationVSAvoiddata transmission volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential error sampling data from multiple regions, focusing on critical error indicators rather than transmitting complete region data. This extraction approach enables effective error source identification by comparing sampling data across regions while keeping the transmitted data volume minimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different error sampling strategies to different regions based on their importance and error susceptibility. By tailoring the sampling approach to each region's characteristics, the system achieves improved error source identification in critical areas without uniformly increasing data transmission volume across all regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260004427A1Error state validation of a media transmission system
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260004427A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004427A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004427A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and systems are disclosed for error state validation of a video transmission system. Image data including one or more image frames is identified by a client device. Two or more regions of the one or more image frames are determined for error sampling. Error sampling data is derived based on the image data, the error sampling data indicating characteristics of one or more image pixels located at the two or more regions. One or more encoding operations are performed to encode the image data. The encoded image data and the error sampling data is transmitted to an additional client device.