Synthesized Video Flicker Distortion Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional 2D quality metrics, such as MSE and PSNR, fail to accurately reflect the perceptual quality of 3D and virtual reality videos due to their pixel-wise differences, which do not consider human perception and are inadequate for assessing flicker distortion in synthesized virtual view videos.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for determining the quality of synthesized video files by processing reference and synthesized video files to compare and quantify flicker distortion, using techniques like Depth Image-based Rendering (DIBR), sparse representation, and weighted pooling to assess flicker and spatial-temporal activity distortions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional 2D quality metrics (MSE, PSNR) are used to assess video quality, then the measurement process is simple and computationally efficient, but the metrics cannot properly reflect the real perceptual quality of visual signals and fail to capture flicker distortion in synthesized videos

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperceptual quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of quality assessment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from conventional 2D pixel-wise comparison to 3D spatio-temporal analysis by incorporating temporal dimension. It processes video sequences across multiple frames and depths, creating a three-dimensional representation that captures flicker distortion and temporal inconsistencies that 2D metrics cannot detect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing stage that transforms raw video data into spatio-temporal gradient representations. This intermediary representation serves as a bridge between the input video and quality assessment, enabling detection of subtle temporal variations and flicker artifacts through gradient analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If pixel-wise difference metrics are used for quality assessment, then the computation is straightforward, but the metrics do not consider human perception and cannot detect flicker distortion in synthesized virtual view videos

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment with human perceptionVSAvoiddifficulty in detecting flicker distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality assessment by analyzing spatio-temporal gradients in specific regions of video frames. Instead of uniform pixel-wise comparison, it focuses on local variations in gradients across space and time, which correspond to human visual sensitivity to flicker and temporal artifacts in different video regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the assessment parameters from static pixel intensity values to dynamic spatio-temporal gradients. By computing gradients across multiple frames and depths, it transforms the measurement parameters to capture temporal variations and flicker characteristics that align with human perception of video quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional quality metrics are used for 3D and VR video assessment, then the evaluation process is simple, but the metrics are inadequate for optimizing compression techniques and improving quality of experience in 3D/VR systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization of compression techniquesVSAvoidloss of perceptual quality information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis of spatio-temporal gradients and flicker distortion characteristics before compression optimization. By pre-characterizing the temporal and spatial variations in the video content, it enables targeted compression strategies that preserve perceptually important information while removing redundant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback mechanism where quality assessment results based on spatio-temporal analysis inform compression parameter optimization. The measured flicker distortion and temporal activity metrics provide feedback for adjusting compression settings to maintain perceptual quality while improving compression efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11310475B2Video quality determination system and method
Publication Date: 2022.04.19 CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
  • US11310475B2 patent drawing
  • US11310475B2 patent drawing
  • US11310475B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method and related system for determining a quality of a synthesized video file. The method includes processing a reference video file and a synthesized video file associated with the reference video file to compare the original video file and the synthesized video file. The method also includes determining an extent of flicker distortion of the synthesized video file based on the processing.