Video Genre Classification Using Probability Vector Normalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in multimedia content analysis is bridging the semantic gap between human interpretations of audio-visual data and machine-processable representations, particularly in classifying video sequences into genres like commercials, cartoons, music, news, and sports, to enable user-specific content selection in TV and web applications.

Innovation Solution

A method involving genre-specific detector modules that provide probability values, analyzed by a combiner using different evaluating units, such as a product rule and Support Vector Machine, to generate a classification signal for video sequences, enhancing reliability through diverse analysis and normalization of probability vectors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple genre-specific detector modules are used to classify video sequences, then the reliability of classification is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The classification system is divided into multiple independent genre-specific detector modules, each responsible for detecting a specific genre. This segmentation allows each module to specialize in one genre classification task, improving overall reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple detector modules are combined into a unified classification system where their individual probability assessments are integrated. The combiner merges the outputs of all detector modules to produce a final classification decision, leveraging the strengths of each specialized detector to achieve high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If different evaluating units with distinct algorithms are used to analyze probability values, then the classification reliability is enhanced, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidalgorithmic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different evaluating units are assigned to different regions of the probability space or different genre types. Each evaluating unit is optimized with a specific algorithm suited to its particular evaluation task, allowing the system to achieve high reliability through specialized local processing rather than uniform complex processing throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and applies different evaluation algorithms based on the specific input characteristics and genre being evaluated. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt its computational complexity to the specific task at hand, using simpler algorithms when sufficient and more complex algorithms only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If detailed analysis including vector summation and normalization is performed to handle discrepancies, then the classification accuracy is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs detailed vector summation and normalization analysis only partially or selectively - specifically when detector modules produce conflicting or uncertain results. When detector agreements are clear and confidence is high, the system can skip or simplify these computationally intensive steps, thereby maintaining high accuracy when needed while minimizing unnecessary processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from preliminary detection results to determine the level of detailed analysis required. When initial detector outputs show strong agreement or high confidence, the feedback mechanism allows the system to proceed directly to classification. When discrepancies or low confidence are detected, the feedback triggers the more time-consuming vector summation and normalization processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8666918B2Video-genre classification
Publication Date: 2014.03.04 TECH UNIV BERLIN
  • US8666918B2 patent drawing
  • US8666918B2 patent drawing
  • US8666918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exemplary embodiment of the invention relates to a method for classifying a video sequence (VS), characterized by the steps of analyzing the video sequence using a plurality of genre-specific detector modules (M1-M5), each genre-specific detector module providing a probability value (P1-P5) indicating the probability that the video sequence belongs to the genre assigned to the genre-specific detector module; and analyzing the probability values of the plurality of genre-specific detector modules using a combiner (CM) which analyzes said probability values and generates a classification signal (SC) classifying the video sequence as belonging to a specific genre (g).